Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-18 Thread Dieter Maurer
Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-17 15:52 -0500: ... An alternative would be a persistent subobject of the synchronized object (such that its modification does not modify the bobobase_modification_time of the primary object). That's not good: unless i find a suitable core zope class to use, if

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-17 Thread Dieter Maurer
Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-16 14:32 -0500: On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:48:45PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote: Synchronization modifies bobobase_modification_time on the target. Yep. A safe method to check whether you have a current state is to register the bobobase_modification_time (on source

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-17 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:13:53PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote: Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-16 14:32 -0500: On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:48:45PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote: Synchronization modifies bobobase_modification_time on the target. Yep. A safe method to check whether you have a

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-16 Thread Dieter Maurer
Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-15 17:28 -0500: ... Yes. These are limitations of comparing objects that have only a bobobase_modification_time timestamp. See ZSyncer/README.txt, in the Usage section. Solving this problem is hard. See ZSyncer/TODO.txt. You should remember the synchronized

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-16 Thread Paul Winkler
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:48:45PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote: Synchronization modifies bobobase_modification_time on the target. Yep. A safe method to check whether you have a current state is to register the bobobase_modification_time (on source and target) that resulted from the

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-15 Thread Dieter Maurer
Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-14 15:30 -0500: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:08:26PM -0600, Carlos de la Guardia wrote: we just installed Zsyncer 0.7.1-beta1 on a couple of our servers and have run into some problems with page template synchronization. Some items that have different time stamps on

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-15 Thread Paul Winkler
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:24:35PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote: Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-1-14 15:30 -0500: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:08:26PM -0600, Carlos de la Guardia wrote: we just installed Zsyncer 0.7.1-beta1 on a couple of our servers and have run into some problems with page

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-14 Thread Paul Winkler
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:08:26PM -0600, Carlos de la Guardia wrote: Hi, we just installed Zsyncer 0.7.1-beta1 on a couple of our servers and have run into some problems with page template synchronization. Some items that have different time stamps on the server and on the development

Re: [Zope] ANN: ZSyncer 0.7.1-beta1 released

2006-01-13 Thread Carlos de la Guardia
Hi, we just installed Zsyncer 0.7.1-beta1 on a couple of our servers and have run into some problems with page template synchronization. Some items that have different time stamps on the server and on the development machines show on th sync screen as synchronized even when they are different.