Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Garito wrote: 2009/4/27 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com snip at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we send you private messages by mistake I don't know what you are talking about here: I didn't threaten to ban anybody. I

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-27 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Garito wrote: jajajajajajajajajajajajaja Amazing! I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field jajajajajajajajajajajajaja I said religious because I meant that people have strong opinions about which style they

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-27 Thread Garito
2009/4/27 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Garito wrote: jajajajajajajajajajajajaja Amazing! I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field jajajajajajajajajajajajaja I said religious because I meant that

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Gerken wrote: Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field? That would be a religious question, and one which is not helpful to debate here.. E.g., see: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html The Zope mailing

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Garito
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja Amazing! I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field jajajajajajajajajajajajaja What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this question You cause the problem, at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we send

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 19:45, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Gerken wrote: Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field? That would be a religious question, and one which is not helpful to debate here..