On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:39:01AM -0700, Joe Pallas wrote:
> I'm pretty sure "new syntax" DTML is not actually valid XML, but it
> doesn't really matter: it's a bad idea either way. The new syntax
> is a misguided attempt to mix the base and meta levels, which can
> only result in confusion.
Original Message-
> From: Joe Pallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 8:39 AM
> To: Martijn Pieters; Hung Jung Lu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Is DTML a bastardized form of XML, or
> valid XML?
&g
I'm pretty sure "new syntax" DTML is not actually valid XML, but it
doesn't really matter: it's a bad idea either way. The new syntax
is a misguided attempt to mix the base and meta levels, which can
only result in confusion.
DTML is not markup, it is a macro language for generating markup.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 05:45:58PM -0700, Hung Jung Lu wrote:
> The rest should be handled through a good GUI (Graphical User Interface),
> with fancy stuff like collapsable panel items. I hope Digicool is doing
> something like this with their Mozilla project.
This kind of feature may indeed bec
