On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Check it out
http://code.google.com/p/zope-memory-readings/
Perhaps useful
Looks really cool. Thanks for releasing it!
Yeah. It also looks nicely
This is what I love about zope. It can be a much more flexible way to
store data than in a relational db. Maybe some combination of zodb and
s3 would be efficient. Zodb for frequently used business objects and a
library (localfs modified ?) for storing data documents on s3. Could
you update your
FuBuJo wrote at 2008-3-14 22:06 +:
...
I thought putting Apache in front of Zope was very common (using VirtualHost
Monster) - guess not.
This is common. But, usually, a ZEO client is not abbreviated as ZEO.
ZEO usually means the ZEO server.
...
It's the python process on the Zeo Client
FuBuJo schrieb:
I apologize that my description was so confusing.
I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the URL and
Garito wrote at 2008-2-29 00:35 +0100:
I can understand Yuri
Zope uses the tree to run and the filesystem is a tree
When I'm developing Yanged (my Zope project) I think about that. I would
like to create a version of Zope with the most essential parts:
the traverse way
the adquisition
in an
Maybe you could map it to libferris instead of the file system and
then we could many types of different data storage.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9373
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garito wrote at 2008-2-29 00:35 +0100:
I can understand
Sure, zope products. But what does it mean to be a zope site without
ZODB? There are ZPT implementations separate from ZODB.
Subversion, grep, sed, whole code changes are all possible with zope 2.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want
I can understand Yuri
Zope uses the tree to run and the filesystem is a tree
When I'm developing Yanged (my Zope project) I think about that. I would
like to create a version of Zope with the most essential parts:
the traverse way
the adquisition
in an apache module (and apache of course)
the
Hi again, Tres!
Can you point as where we can find this kind of help? Are there some
reference manual or similar? (I'm using Zope2) Perhaps on Five manual?
Thanks a lot!
2008/1/15, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jurian Botha wrote:
I'm
upper(lastname) like upper(dtml-sqlvar lastname type=string)
* Don't use LIKE without any regular expression
* Use ILIKE instead of UPPER(...) = UPPER(...) since it's usually faster
(I've proven this for PostgreSQL at least)
* Fastest method is always to use an index and you can
Providing your database has the upper() function, or replace with similar
select ...
dtml-sqlgroup where
dtml-if firstname
upper(firstname) like upper(dtml-sqlvar firstname type=string)
/dtml-if
dtml-or
dtml-if lastname
upper(lastname) like upper(dtml-sqlvar lastname
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
New build is available:
http://files.enfoldsystems.com/Zope-2.9.8-Final-7409.exe
After some light testing, it's also now officially up:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.8
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
chan.yinghoong wrote:
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there plans to release Zope 2.9.8 window installer also?
Sidnei, could you crank the handle?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Right you are. For some reason a brand new installation of FC6 didn't
include 127.0.0.1 address in /etc/hosts.
Thanks a lot.
Roman
On Aug 2, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
File string, line 1, in connect
gaierror: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
Do I have to downgrade to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13 Jul 2007, at 01:40, David Ayres wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the replies. In the past, I usually created
a brand
new instance and just copied over my Data.fs, Products, etc. But, I
figured
there was a way to do an upgrade. Attempt 1:
: [Zope] Re: Zope 2.10.4 Upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13 Jul 2007, at 01:40, David Ayres wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the replies. In the past, I usually created a
brand new instance and just copied over my Data.fs, Products, etc.
But, I figured there was a way
Thanks to everyone for the replies. In the past, I usually created a brand
new instance and just copied over my Data.fs, Products, etc. But, I figured
there was a way to do an upgrade. Attempt 1: Failed. :)
If I run mkzopeinstance over my existing instance, will it upgrade the
instance without
Don't repair which is not broken
Make downgrade...
I have Mandrake 9.1 with Zope 2.5.1 and second server Mandrake 10.2 with
Zope 2.9.4, old mandrake is much more better, at 10.2 I have in crontab
line:
00 4 * * * root /zope/../bin/zopectl restart
It sometimes hangs me too.
-
In the trace.log (after turning this on) we can see entries for
the last requests that completes and three requests that begins,
but never finish (see below).
This is typical behaviour when all your threads are busy. Zope
accepts requests and AFAIR they're even written into z2.log but
doesn't
I'm using MySQLDBA, and I've got a Z SQL Method like this:
select * from myTable where someValue=dtml-sqlvar myValue type=string
The issue being that 'myValue' is actually a Hex value in a Blob
column. The only types possible for dtml-sqlvar seem to be string and
int (as far as I can tell).
--On 26. März 2007 16:49:30 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Balmer wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I uploaded corrected versions of the Zope 2.9.7 and 2.10.3 tar-balls.
The tar-balls released yesterday contained a bug that caused
--On 26. März 2007 20:29:21 + Maurits van Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung, on 2007-03-26:
I uploaded corrected versions of the Zope 2.9.7 and 2.10.3 tar-balls.
The tar-balls released yesterday contained a bug that caused
a startup failure when using zopectl start.
Great,
On 3/27/07, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.8.9 release does not contain this error since Python decorators
aren't available in Python 2.3 (the official blessed Python version).
The problem *does* exist as decorators are just a nice way of spelling:
methodName =
--On 27. März 2007 07:41:06 +0200 Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/07, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.8.9 release does not contain this error since Python decorators
aren't available in Python 2.3 (the official blessed Python version).
The problem *does* exist
On 2/27/07, Paul Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Williams wrote:
Ok, here is what we have. I did a netstat on both machines, client and
server. The client sees and established connection and the server does
not.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:50:38AM +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
What's already possible is to have a minimal ZODB with only one
persistent object: a SQLObject or SQLAlchemy container. That's a
container (e.g. like a folder) whose items aren't persisted in the ZODB
but come from a
I always add my LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable to the zopectl and runzope
scripts so that this kind of thing never happens.
I have also found that I needed to add ORACLE_HOME to either the
zope.conf or zope start scripts when using DCOracle or some other
add-on that uses loadable libs.
In fact, you
Nico Grubert wrote at 2007-1-17 10:08 +0100:
...
(gdb) thread 1
[Switching to thread 1 (Thread 47050976353024 (LWP 6613))]#0
0x2acae8a3e202 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) call PyRun_SimpleString(import sys, traceback;
sys.stderr=open('/tmp/tb','w',0); traceback.print_stack())
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2007, at 06:06, Suresh V wrote:
Tasks: 91 total, 2 running, 89 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 10.4%us, 0.4%sy, 0.0%ni, 89.0%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si
Mem: 9041256k total, 9025124k used,16132k free,10604k
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:10, Dieter Maurer wrote:
I can see that such a strategy may be helpful when one wants to
resolve conflicts in some way. However, I do not see
why is should be necessary for registration that are not expected
to conflict.
Going into some detail. If imports have
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-12 03:03 -0500:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:10, Dieter Maurer wrote:
I can see that such a strategy may be helpful when one wants to
resolve conflicts in some way. However, I do not see
why is should be necessary for registration that are not expected
to
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:03, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-11 03:12 -0500:
...
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
DO NOT POPULATE THE CA WHILE IMPORTING!!!
This is so bad on so many levels. Dieter, your problem is just one
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:03, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-11 03:12 -0500:
...
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
DO NOT POPULATE THE CA WHILE IMPORTING!!!
This is so bad on so many levels. Dieter, your problem is just one
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-11 06:58 -0500:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 05:59, Chris Withers wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
Why is the CA predicated on ZCML?!
Because that's how it works by default. Another way of saying this
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-11 03:12 -0500:
...
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
DO NOT POPULATE THE CA WHILE IMPORTING!!!
This is so bad on so many levels. Dieter, your problem is just one example.
Another is that unit tests have no chance to work reliably
Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-1-11 03:12 -0500:
...
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
DO NOT POPULATE THE CA WHILE IMPORTING!!!
This is so bad on so many levels. Dieter, your problem is just one example.
Another is that unit tests have no chance to work reliably
pol wrote at 2007-1-3 23:31 +0100:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Maybe, you have a look at LocalFS.
It seems to be not compatible with zope 2.9.6
I have copied the LocalFS-1.3-andreas.tar.gz into the products, but
it's not even shown in Control Panel - Product Management list.
Have i missed anything?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 3. Januar 2007 23:31:27 +0100 pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Maybe, you have a look at LocalFS.
It seems to be not compatible with zope 2.9.6
I have copied the LocalFS-1.3-andreas.tar.gz into the products, but
it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 24. November 2006 14:25:53 +0100 Christian Steinhauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zope 2.9 and Zope 2.10 currently show up with unreleased
version inside the control panel. App/version_txt.py tries
to read the file
Daniel Lopez wrote at 2006-10-16 13:31 -0700:
I made one tweak to the double-fork procedure, adding a waitpid call in the
grandparent process (the original zope thread) before it returns out of the
external method... the code then looked something like:
[...prefork code up to here...]
pid1 =
You might also try running zope under runzope instead of under
zopectl. IIRC zopectl itself sets signal handlers and performs a
fork before starting zope, so the inherited environment may not be
what you think it is.
- C
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Daniel Lopez wrote:
I made one
Maurits, you seem to be working as root, which is the root of all
evil (pun intended). Don't do that, ever. The permission issues you
reported also only crop up if the tarball is extracted while root.
Don't do that!
Stefan
On 5. Okt 2006, at 13:12, Maurits van Rees wrote:
BTW, after a
--On 5. Oktober 2006 13:19:26 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maurits, you seem to be working as root, which is the root of all evil
(pun intended). Don't do that, ever. The permission issues you reported
also only crop up if the tarball is extracted while root. Don't do
--On 3. Oktober 2006 10:50:34 + Maurits van Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maurits van Rees, on 2006-10-03:
Andreas Jung, on 2006-10-03:
on behalf of Zope developer community I am pleased to announce the
release=20 of Zope 2.10.0.
You can download Zope 2.10.0 from:
--On 3. Oktober 2006 15:27:12 + Maurits van Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung, on 2006-10-03:
Feel free to file a collector issue.
Probably better, yes. Done:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2201
Possibly this issue is caused by a different umask on my new Linux
George Lee wrote:
David H [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding is that Zettai is closing down. Bummer cause I have
been using them.
I know they are not accepting new orders, but I wasn't aware they are shutting
down. How have you heard? (I also have a Zettai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Sep 2006, at 11:11, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Interesting. I've always considered blogs to be fairly invisible
since I have to go look for them, whereas for mailing lists I can
sign
up for things I'm interested in.
Exactly. This is
- Original Message -
From: Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:16 PM
Subject: [Zope] Re: Zope hangs when database takes too long to respond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sinang, Danny wrote:
Sorry for the typo error.
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Another possible solution is to have a look at twisted:
http://twistedmatrix.com/projects/core/documentation/howto/faq.html
Unless he wants to rewrite his application, Twisted likely won't
help, right?
The OP may also want to see why his MySQL
- Original Message -
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Zope hangs when database takes too long to respond
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Another
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Unless he wants to rewrite his application, Twisted likely won't
help, right?
Twisted is, as i said Another possible solution - yes it will
require work to integrate, but it is still a potential solution. I
don't like to tell people what to
- Original Message -
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Zope hangs when database takes too long to respond
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Unless he
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Well, by those standards, I propose he look at Delphi too... ;-)
Do you mean he should consult the Oracle? ;-)
Sure, why not, while he's at it? ;-) We can probably even haul in
Interbase.
P.S. I really was trying to be helpful
Sure, I
- Original Message -
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Zope hangs when database takes too long to respond
On Sep 6, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Well
Thanks for your responses. I can say from experience that even a barely known blog by an unheralded developer can attract some attention now and then and that blogs by leading developers of a given project, like Philipp's own blog, can be a very good source of news about an interesting project.
Hi Max,
Max M wrote:
(Having seen a server wiped out via an IIS security hole, I just don't
trust it on a public IP - long time ago, but once bitten, twice shy!)
Hmmm ... then try making a mistake in your apache httpd.conf and turn on
proxy by mistake.
Sure - but I'm much more worried
--On 7. August 2006 12:42:38 + Duncan Booth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
James Davies wrote:
Another major issue I've discovered is Zope hosting. We reguarly
deploy custom sites on shared zope environments, and having to
restart an entire server just to update one
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2006-8-7 15:14 +0100:
...
Apparently the bug is somewhere deep in the ZODB code (thanks Dieter
Maurer for pointing this out some time ago) and that's a domain I'm very
very novice in debugging.
You must have misinterpreted me:
I can assure you that the ZODB is not
Matthew X. Economou wrote at 2006-6-6 14:44 -0400:
...
In short, no, Zope will consume all available CPU cycles after some amount of
idle time, due to a threading-related flaw in Zope, GRUF, Plone,
LDAPUserFolder, python-ldap, or OpenLDAP (I don't know which).
You can use Florent's
You can use Florent's DeadlockDebugger to find out what happens.
This is true for someone with the requisite skills and plenty of time.
In my case, the actual deadlock happens in a system library routine
(sigaction, as I recall), making the identification of the component
that's actually at
Josef Meile wrote:
If your Zope auth solution can put a header in the http response,
then you can use a custom apache logging directive to put this in your
Apache log in place of what it thinks the username is.
I put this on the log method of the medusa/http_server.py file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PS: The aim of my client's project is to have a central staff
directory
with all staff usernames and passwords, and group/role based
authorization
info controlled though a single Plone Web interface. For example, I
have
set up to be qmailGroup
I'll chime in with a me too ( see me thread within the last week on the same
list).
I haven't looked into it as deeply as you, but I have tried the
DeadlockDebugger which itself was inaccessible during the time when zope was
spinning. Nothing in the logs.
My install is Zope 2.8.5 on RHEL 4
Hello David, sorry, I meant you before, but hey, hello too Dieter ;-)
I think I broke the thread, sorry for reposting:
I finally manage to install and run Zope 2.8.6 on Mac Intel after
installing the Universal package of python 2.4.3 for os x
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.3/).
Hello Dieter,
Thanks for your help, I have Zope 2.8.6 and Python 2.3.5 compiled with
Fink. I also had the same problem with python 2.3.5 from Apple, which
is known to lack some features, so you might be right with conflicting
Python version. Under Unbutu, I used to compile Zope with python-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't see how a packaged Python that is possibly compiled with
dubious options and split up along dubious lines into Python, Python-
dev and Python-whatever is better than a self-compiled Python on OS X.
The following document tells you how to
Thank you, I tried that already, but for some reasons, it did'nt work
2006/4/14, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't see how a packaged Python that is possibly compiled with
dubious options and split up along dubious lines into Python,
manuel spuhler wrote at 2006-4-12 21:40 +0200:
...
File /opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/ZODB/__init__.py, line 21, in ?
from persistent import TimeStamp
File /opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/persistent/__init__.py, line 19, in ?
from cPersistence import Persistent, GHOST, UPTODATE, CHANGED, STICKY
Dieter Maurer wrote:
manuel spuhler wrote at 2006-4-12 21:40 +0200:
...
File "/opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/ZODB/__init__.py", line 21, in ?
from persistent import TimeStamp
File "/opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/persistent/__init__.py", line 19, in ?
from cPersistence import Persistent,
Hello,
I re-installed Tiger on my Mac from scratch, and tried to compile Zope
(with python from Fink). Hopefully, everything went fine this time.
Then I succeeded to instanciate Zope.
And I started Zope, and it failed, bouhouhou.
As I am totally new in Python/C I don't know what the error
Hugo Ramos wrote:
I don't know. What I do know is that I'm not a newbie AND I did my
homework (google+other sources) before coming here!
Then how come you managed to miss Paul Browning and Matt Hamilton's
extensive documentation of the subject?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management,
Maybe I just misspelled the word affinity and wrote it with just 1 f
afinity...
Hey Chris.. Cheer up dude! Try not be this hard to people that just
want to learn a bit more... Specially because back in 2000 I had you
as a Zope icon in Europe.
I'm working in Brazil now... The entire Brazilian
+---[ Hugo Ramos ]--
|
| Anyway... There's a lot of jobs for good professionals like you!
| Salary is much more than the average Brazilian makes... Maybe this
| country could be good for you! :-)
Don't worry Hugo, if Chris keeps going the way he's going, eventually he'll
Jeff Donsbach said the following on 2006-03-21 17:26:
Dario,
Do you have any kind of comparison numbers of using CPU affinity
vs not for your particular case? Also, are you using ZEO or not? It's
not that I don't believe you when you say it matters a lot for you. I
do believe you. Like
Chris Withers said the following on 2006-03-22 01:36:
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Dario, I actually think your comment here is a bit out of order if
you're referring to this post of mine:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2006-March/165574.html
yes, it was and I apologise for it, you did
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Unfortunaltey, that is the ways things work, and I think we all have to
prepare to be nice to those newbies too.
I think we have a right to expect those newbies to be nice back ;-)
Generally speaking, with the growing poularity of Zope-solutions, where
Plone and
Many things were said here... Lots of Kb's spent going around the world...
The main question remained unexplained!
Maybe Chris didn't know the answer and just directed this thread to
another direction where he could be much more exposed as the
zope@zope.org father???
I don't know. What I do know
Zope/Plone binary installer from http://plone.org/products/plone runs perfectly on Mac Intel !;-)
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Martijn Pieters said the following on 2006-03-16 12:25:
On 3/16/06, Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey... but thank you Jens for spending all that time writing an email
that doesn't help any1 at all...!!!
check google for multiple use of exclamation marks.
Or look up Terry
Dario Lopez-Kästen schrieb:
...
The fact that the issue of the GIL is not more prominent in the Zope
worlds, I think is because relatively few zopistas are aware that there
is a problem; mostly, because not so many run multicpu-boxes in
production, and also because of attitude, I suppose:
Tino Wildenhain said the following on 2006-03-21 14:51:
Otoh, I have yet to see the figures showing the CPU afinity
buys you anything in reality. We know the GIL, thats for sure
but I never saw a measureable difference binding a process
to a CPU (which is also highly depending on the OS
On 3/21/06, Dario Lopez-Kästen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tino Wildenhain said the following on 2006-03-21 14:51:
Otoh, I have yet to see the figures showing the CPU afinity
buys you anything in reality. We know the GIL, thats for sure
but I never saw a measureable difference binding a
On 20 Mar 2006, at 07:42, Bernd Dorn wrote:
$ make
/usr/local/bin/python2.3 /Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-
final/setup.py \
build
--build-base=/Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/build-base/
python-2.3
--build-lib=/Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/build-base/
you need zlib support compiled into python, this is only done, if thezlib header files are found at configure time
do you have it?I have zlib included at configure time
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**
On 20.03.2006, at 09:37, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 20 Mar 2006, at 07:42, Bernd Dorn wrote:
$ make
/usr/local/bin/python2.3 /Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-
final/setup.py \
build
--build-base=/Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/build-base/
python-2.3
on osx i would suggest using darwinports anywayTried with darwinports compiled form source (best on mac intel), and got the same error.
$ ./configure --with-python=/opt/local/bin/python2.3 make... error: package directory 'build/lib/darwin-8/5/2-i386-2/4/zope/app/traversing/ftests' does not
On 20.03.2006, at 20:46, manuel spuhler wrote:
on osx i would suggest using darwinports anyway
Tried with darwinports compiled form source (best on mac intel),
and got the same error.
$ ./configure --with-python=/opt/local/bin/python2.3 make
...
error: package directory
$ make
/usr/bin/python /Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/
setup.py \
build
--build-base=/Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/build-base/
python-2.3
--build-lib=/Users/spuhlema/Desktop/Zope-2.8.6-final/build-base/
python-2.3/build-lib
Hello,
Thank you for your hints. I successfully compiled python2.3.5 for OS
10.4, as described in Florent Guillaume's blog, but when I try to
compile Zope, I get the same error:
$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/Zope2.8 --with-python=/usr/local/bin/python2.3
Using Python interpreter at
On 19 Mar 2006, at 19:30, manuel spuhler wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your hints. I successfully compiled python2.3.5 for OS
10.4, as described in Florent Guillaume's blog, but when I try to
compile Zope, I get the same error:
There must be some odd difference then. It all works just fine on
On 19.03.2006, at 20:30, manuel spuhler wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your hints. I successfully compiled python2.3.5 for OS
10.4, as described in Florent Guillaume's blog, but when I try to
compile Zope, I get the same error:
$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/Zope2.8 --with-python=/usr/local/bin/
Hugo Ramos wrote:
I think these questions are very ZOPE RELATED since I asked them in a
Zope mailing list don't you think?
No, we don't. This has nothing specific to do with Zope. Process
affinity is an OS-specific thing, and if you care about it you should as
on an OS-specific forum. In
On 3/16/06, Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey... but thank you Jens for spending all that time writing an email
that doesn't help any1 at all...!!!
check google for multiple use of exclamation marks.
Or look up Terry Pratchett quotes on www.lspace.org:
'Multiple exclamation
Yes... But I'm looking for more specific answers about how to create
the affinity between 1 of the zope processes and the CPU n.2, for
example...
How to make that a permanent choice?
Cheers
Hugo
On 3/15/06, Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugo Ramos wrote:
Yellow,
I'm using Zope+Apache
On 15 Mar 2006, at 21:11, Hugo Ramos wrote:
Yes... But I'm looking for more specific answers about how to create
the affinity between 1 of the zope processes and the CPU n.2, for
example...
How to make that a permanent choice?
This question has nothing to do with Zope. You will need to find
Has any1 tried this before? Can you point me to some documentation?
What's your experience? is it true that not doing this the 4 cpu's
will not be 100% used?
I think these questions are very ZOPE RELATED since I asked them in a
Zope mailing list don't you think?
I'm asking about Zope
On 3/15/06, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That question is not Zope specific -- you would need to modify the start
scripts for your appservers to make whatever kernel / libc-specific
calls are needed (on Solaris, it would be invoking the 'pbind' command).
In the worst case, you would
Hugo Ramos schrieb:
Has any1 tried this before? Can you point me to some documentation?
What's your experience? is it true that not doing this the 4 cpu's
will not be 100% used?
I think these questions are very ZOPE RELATED since I asked them in a
Zope mailing list don't you think?
I'm
Uhm, you sure this patch is a good idea? Why not use
portal_catalog.unrestrictedSearchResults?
Stefan
On 17. Feb 2006, at 10:14, Pawel Lewicki wrote:
Hi,
The problem is with portal_catalog. See/apply this patch
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/380
Pawel
--
Anything that happens,
David wrote:
I moved to Apache (for SSL) because its independent of Zope and it will
give you SSL and the power of a world class server when you need it.
ZopeSSL worked fine (when i last tried it, like zope 2.4x).
For SSL and HTTP sanitisation, I wouldn't trust anything that doesn't
get the
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
