--On 26. Juli 2005 22:40:18 +0200 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They did the work on our behalf, and most excellently executed the
worldwide registration of the mark. The trademarks were transferred fully
to the
Plone Foundation as agreed.
So any idea why the WIPO database tell us
I would like to inform that ZEA is in the process to transfer the trademark to Zope Corporation. A number of actions will be taken including the preparation of the list of expenses to secure the trademark, and meetings with our trademark expert to work on the administrative details. We would like
+---[ Xavier Heymans ]--
| I would like to inform that ZEA is in the process to transfer the trademark to
| Zope Corporation. A number of actions will be taken including the preparation
| of the list of expenses to secure the trademark, and meetings with our
| trademark
Andreas Jung wrote at 2005-7-21 08:29 +0200:
... ZEA silently registering the Zope logo ...
If it wasn't a secret I am sure that ZC would know about the secret.
This reminds me a discussion between two business students:
They planned how to make money with little effort.
Their business
HAHAHHAHA!!! LOL!
Man! There has got to be some humor in this at some point!
Honestly, though, I appreciate your discussions being held here. I
truly appreciate the fact that I have Zope to work with and offer to
my customers. I feel that I owe that thanks not only to Zope
Corporation, but to
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Juli 2005 19:17:59 -0500 George Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
ZC says: the marks were stolen
ZEA seems to be saying: the marks were registered defensively.
My read on this is that there is a serious communication problem going
on
--On 21. Juli 2005 08:02:32 +0200 robert rottermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am a casual watcher of what happens in the Zope community (I only check
the development things actively).
However I believe that I knew that ZE did register the Zope logo.
(All tough instinctively I would have to
Am Mittwoch, den 20.07.2005, 19:17 -0500 schrieb George Donnelly:
Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
ZC says: the marks were stolen
ZEA seems to be saying: the marks were registered defensively.
My read on this is that there is a serious communication problem going
on here between the lines. Why
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
The statement of ZC indicates they want to transfer their trademark
to ZF and now find the european trademark in other hands. OTOH, why
not just transfer/licence what they have (the .us trademark) and
just agree to ZEA transfer/licence the european trademark to ZF
too?
Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
Beyond that point, _we_ are the first registrants of the
ZOPE trademark in WIPO. ZEA registered our LOGO, not the
word ZOPE, which we registered _before_ they registered the
LOGO. So, everyone, please pay attention. We did _not_
ignore our trademark rights in Europe. We
ZC: Potay-to.
ZEA: Potah-to.
ZC: Potay-to!
ZEA: Potah-to!
ZC: Potay-to!!
ZEA: Potah-to!!
ZC: POTAY-TO, you evil thief!!!
ZEA: POTAH-TO you dictatiorial pig!!
Not a communications problem? My ass.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
--On 20. Juli 2005 12:43:22 +0100 Matt Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ZEA's registration represents an abuse of registration
and management of international trademarks and the
misappropriation of a mark that is clearly the property
of Zope Corporation.
So why is Zope Foundation
Hi Godefroid,
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
It's definitely better to speak about it in the open air, where we all
will be able to think about it together.
Amen.
I wasn't aware of this until ten minutes ago, and now it seems a whole
bunch of stuff has gone on, up to and including people getting
Philip Kilner wrote:
This has the potential to make the Zope community look like muppets, and
not in a good Swedish chef kind of way...
I'm not sure muppetism applies to the Zope community, it appears to be
Zope Corporation who are coming out of this looking less than clever.
It's a shame,
Hi Chris,
Chris Withers wrote:
This has the potential to make the Zope community look like muppets, and
not in a good Swedish chef kind of way...
I'm not sure muppetism applies to the Zope community, it appears to be
Zope Corporation who are coming out of this looking less than clever.
Philip Kilner wrote:
Agreed/understood - but ZC are part of the community, too - the BDFL
part, I guess.
Well, ZC are becoming less benign and more dictatorial, and that's where
the BDFL model breaks down...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
Godefroid Chapelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing against the ZF : there is sthing against ZC being the
sole owner of the TMs when the current value of it has been established
by the community as a whole, especially out of USA.
This is why I support the proposal made by a few
Florent Guillaume wrote:
The current state of what ZC proposes doesn't prevent anyone from doing
anything reasonable.
Give them your hand, and they'll ask for your arm...
Indeed. I don't have any problem with ZC keeping the trademarks, but why
are they tying the creation of the foundation
Everybody needs to calm down, stop insulting each other and stop
broadcasting this problem to the whole world on zope-announce (for
example). Its making us all look childish.
+1. Please folks, remember that this is a public venue and your
words will be archived for a long time. Let's have no
--On 20. Juli 2005 19:17:59 -0500 George Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
ZC says: the marks were stolen
ZEA seems to be saying: the marks were registered defensively.
My read on this is that there is a serious communication problem going
on here between the lines.
20 matches
Mail list logo