Hi Pascal. These are good suggestions. Can you point me to something
that could help me with the Site Access Rule part of this solution? I
am sure I can google for a mod_rewrite rule that could help.
Regards,
David
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Pascal Peregrina wrote:
Traversal
Hi Peter. This is very interesting. I will look at the code! I agree
with you about exposing the zsql methods and also I tend to use a
naming convention for zsql methods might even stick out more. Many
thanks for your reply.
Regards,
David
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Peter
Hi Jonathan. Thank you for your reply. The ? = & don't make for very
friendly or future proof urls. I have thought of this possibility you
have suggested but thought there might be a way to do this with
traversal. I read a tutorial by Chris McDonough getting rid of the ? =
& appeared to
I have never used traversal into zsql methods simply because I don't
want to expose geeky things like "employee_by_id" to the user. People
should be able to find out what you call your ZSQL methods. My
suggestion is to consider a more controlled solution.
About having request variables in the URL
e and some mod_rewrite magic
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jonathan
Sent: 22 June 2005 16:15
To: David Pratt
Cc: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Traversal question
- Original Message -
From: "David Pratt" <[EMAIL P
- Original Message -
From: "David Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have gone over the zope book to see what I can do about calling a sql
with a form and getting three additional parameters in the request and am
wanting this to get better looking urls that calling the parameters
directly
I have gone over the zope book to see what I can do about calling a sql
with a form and getting three additional parameters in the request and
am wanting this to get better looking urls that calling the parameters
directly in the url. I asked a similar question yesterday but perhaps
it was