Re: [Zope] UNEXPECTED: Acquisition.Explicit may acquire implicitly

2001-01-03 Thread Dieter Maurer

Pierre-Julien Grizel writes:
 > Dieter Maurer wrote:
 > > 
 > > This implies, that the idiom
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > cannot be used safely to test, whether "o" has attribute
 > >  itself (rather than acquired it).
 > > We probably should have a standard function for this kind
 > > of test.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Mhhh  Something like "" ?
"aq_base" is not considered safe and unavailable in DTML.

But you are right, that would be the implementation of the
function, I call for.


Dieter

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )




Re: [Zope] UNEXPECTED: Acquisition.Explicit may acquire implicitly

2001-01-02 Thread Pierre-Julien Grizel

Dieter Maurer wrote:
> 
> While trying to understand, what the "bself= self.aq_explicit"
> in "OFS.DTMLMethod.__call__" should do, I detected an unexpected
> behaviour:
> 
> usually, this "bself" acquires implicitly from
> its container (though not from its context)
> 
> More precisely:
> 
> if "bself.aq_self" is itself an implicit acquisition
> wrapper, the "bself.aq_explicit" acquires implicitly
> from "bself.aq_self.aq_parent".
> 
> The following Python module demonstrates the behaviour:
> 
> ---
> from Acquisition import Implicit
> 
> class C(Implicit): pass
> 
> b= C()
> b.i= 0
> b.d= C()
> b.h= C()
> 
> e_bd= b.d.aq_explicit
> try:
> e_bd.i
> print 'e_bd implicitly acquired i'
> except AttributeError: pass
> 
> e_bhd= b.h.d.aq_explicit
> try:
> e_bhd.i
> print 'e_bhd implicitly acquired i'
> except AttributeError: pass
> ---
> 
> At first, I thought this were a bug.
> At second thought, however, it appears to be quite
> natural, though unexpected:
> 
> if o is self.__of__(parent), then
> getattr(o.aq_explicit,k) = getattr(self,k).__of__(o)
> 
> If "self" is an implicit wrapper itself,
> then acquisition may be used to look up "k".
> 
> This implies, that the idiom
> 
> 
> 
> cannot be used safely to test, whether "o" has attribute
>  itself (rather than acquired it).
> We probably should have a standard function for this kind
> of test.



Mhhh  Something like "" ?




P.-J.



> 
> Dieter
> 
> ___
> Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

-- 
If the only tool you have is a hammer, 
you tend to see every problem as a nail.
Si le seul outil dont vous disposez est un marteau, 
vous avez tendance à voir chaque problème comme un clou. 
   --Abraham Maslow

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )