ECTED]
Sent: October 19, 2006 8:15 AM
To: Doyon, Jean-Francois; zope@zope.org
Subject: RE: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
--On 19. Oktober 2006 08:07:37 -0400 "Doyon, Jean-Francois"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H, but said headers wouldn't be sufficient, unless I
Hi,
Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Ah yes, indeed, I could do custom logging ... But then I'd have to worry
> about the performance impact, the fact that because these logs would be
> custom, I'd need custom analysis tools as well (unless I can make it
> compatible somehow?) ... And so on ...
>
--On 19. Oktober 2006 08:07:37 -0400 "Doyon, Jean-Francois"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H, but said headers wouldn't be sufficient, unless I set custom ones
for each (CMF, in my case) content type.
Why wouldn't that help? A logged header "image/gif" or "image/jpeg" is
clearly an indica
ki; zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
--On 19. Oktober 2006 12:34:28 +0200 Sascha Ottolski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
>> The big problem I have is determining "file types" withou
h more standard solutions!
Thanks for the idea though ...
J.F.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sascha Ottolski
Sent: October 19, 2006 6:34 AM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 200
--On 19. Oktober 2006 12:34:28 +0200 Sascha Ottolski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
The big problem I have is determining "file types" without having
"file extensions", since many objects are name with a simple id that
doesn't co
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
> The big problem I have is determining "file types" without having
> "file extensions", since many objects are name with a simple id that
> doesn't contain a typical file extension.
>
> This makes it supremely difficult to determine
