Sebastien Douche a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:56, Jean-Michel FRANCOIS
> wrote:
>
>> Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
>> to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
>>
>> I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:56, Jean-Michel FRANCOIS
wrote:
> Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
> to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
>
> I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
> the world of profiling file format. I
It's done, i m now able to use KCachegrind with ZopeProfiler. I have
patched pyprof2calltree to work with python2.4:
diff -U 3 -H -d -r -N --
pyprof2calltree-1.1.0-py2.4.egg/pyprof2calltree.py
pyprof2calltree-1.1.0-py2.4.egg.NEW//pyprof2calltree.py
--- pyprof2calltree-1.1.0-py2.4.egg/pyprof2callt
Dieter Maurer a écrit :
> Jean-Michel FRANCOIS wrote at 2009-1-28 16:56 +0100:
>
>> Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
>> to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
>>
>> I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
>> the worl
Jean-Michel FRANCOIS wrote at 2009-1-28 16:56 +0100:
>Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
>to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
>
>I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
>the world of profiling file format. It seems tha