On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 18:48 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> That surely is possible. How much you need to rewrite it impossible to
> answer without knowing your code. You don't "talk" to Zope the same
> way you "talk" to Twisted, for example.
>
OK, you can look at the code at
http://gnukhata.gnul
On 5/3/09 12:40 PM, Krishnakant wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> By the way, for the record, you *might* be better off trying to serve up your
>> Twisted app through WSGI and use WSGI middleware to do the
>> authentication/authorization, and what-have-you inst
>> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> By the way, for the record, you *might* be better off trying to serve up your
> Twisted app through WSGI and use WSGI middleware to do the
> authentication/authorization, and what-have-you instead of trying to tie your
> application
>> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> By the way, for the record, you *might* be better off trying to serve up your
> Twisted app through WSGI and use WSGI middleware to do the
> authentication/authorization, and what-have-you instead of trying to tie your
> application
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 13:04, Krishnakant wrote:
>
>> It's really up to you. Personally, I would recommend looking into
>> either Grok, which is based on Zope 3, or BFG, which is a minimalistic
>> framework using Zope 3 technologies.
>>
>> http://grok.zope.org/
>> http://bfg.repoze.org/
>>
> I see
On 5/3/09 11:21 AM, Krishnakant wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> No, at least without doing "some work" (where "some work" is more than just
>> dropping your code into a directory and expecting Zope to pick it up and
>> "serve
>> it out"). It will essentially
On 5/3/09 11:21 AM, Krishnakant wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> No, at least without doing "some work" (where "some work" is more than just
>> dropping your code into a directory and expecting Zope to pick it up and
>> "serve
>> it out"). It will essentially
> On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> No, at least without doing "some work" (where "some work" is more than just
> dropping your code into a directory and expecting Zope to pick it up and
> "serve
> it out"). It will essentially be a rewrite, although maybe with some ca
On 5/2/09 7:04 AM, Krishnakant wrote:
>> It's really up to you. Personally, I would recommend looking into
>> either Grok, which is based on Zope 3, or BFG, which is a minimalistic
>> framework using Zope 3 technologies.
>>
>> http://grok.zope.org/
>> http://bfg.repoze.org/
>>
> I see, By the way w
> It's really up to you. Personally, I would recommend looking into
> either Grok, which is based on Zope 3, or BFG, which is a minimalistic
> framework using Zope 3 technologies.
>
> http://grok.zope.org/
> http://bfg.repoze.org/
>
I see, By the way will 5 help me solve this confusion?
> > But
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:45, Krishnakant wrote:
> My first question is, should I use zope 2 or zope3 for a financial/
> accounting software? I am not intending to develop just a web site but
> a complete web application which will be used in fields like Point of
> Sales and micro finance. I fee
On 02.05.09 10:45, Krishnakant wrote:
> hello all,
> I am new to this mailing list and pritty new to zope as well.
>
> I have been reading the zope wiki and trying to find many answers to all
> the questions I have about this very powerful application server.
>
> My first question is, should I use
12 matches
Mail list logo
