+1 Clayton's idea. But can't we use "paster" as basic namespace? Regards
-- Marcos F. Romero Responsable de Desarrollo Inter-Cultura marcos.rom...@inter-cultura.com www.inter-cultura.com +54 11 4542-8299 On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Clayton Parker <clay...@sixfeetup.com> wrote: > On Oct 4, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Cristopher Ewing wrote: > >> Greetings all, >> >> I have taken the first steps towards a refactoring of ZopeSkel from a >> monolithic package into a federated series of namespace packages. For >> information on the reasoning behind this move, and the goals of the move, >> please refer to the SPLITTING_PROPOSAL document in the trunk of ZopeSkel: >> >> http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/ZopeSkel/trunk/SPLITTING-PROPOSAL.txt > > I was reviewing the proposal and had a thought about naming. There is no real > reason to use the zopeskel namespace, especially for the core package. > Shouldn't we make the namespace more inviting to non Zope projects? > > I took a look on pypi and there are current packages named skel and skeleton. > One abandoned package is called skeletor. It had similar goals way back when. > That would be a fitting name, but would probably be confusing given there is > already a skeletor package. > > Just thought I'd voice my concern before we got too far into the renaming > process. The ZopeSkel egg could still serve as the all-in-one for Zope/Plone > devs. > > Clayton > -- > Six Feet Up, Inc. | Sponsor of Plone Conference 2010 (Oct. 25th-31st) > Direct Line: +1 (317) 861-5948 x603 > Email: clay...@sixfeetup.com > Try Plone 4 Today at: http://plone4demo.com > > How am I doing? Please contact my manager Gabrielle Hendryx-Parker > at gabrie...@sixfeetup.com with any feedback. > > > _______________________________________________ > ZopeSkel mailing list > ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel > _______________________________________________ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
