Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-26 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Approve Yes, we cannot JSONify the EXPath module. More than that, this processing depends on XML data formats for which it doesn't make sense to do it on JSON because the input data is XML and people want to process that. A JSONiq geo module would be a completely separate effort. Right

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-26 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue starting for the following merge proposals: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module/+merge/170214 Progress dashboard at http://jenkins.lambda.nu/view/ValidationQueue --

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-26 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue succeeded - proposal merged! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module/+merge/170214 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba/geoproj-module. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-26 Thread noreply
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module has been updated. Status: Needs review = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module/+merge/170214 -- https://code.launchpad.net

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-09 Thread Chris Hillery
Review: Needs Information The changes as made seem fine. Two concerns: 1. Are there any errors raised by the module functions? If so, are they documented? 2. Matthias: This seems like it is an ideal candidate for JSONify-ing; would you agree? If so, what would you think is the priority? I'm

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-09 Thread Juan Zacarias
The changes as made seem fine. Two concerns: 1. Are there any errors raised by the module functions? If so, are they documented? No errors are thrown by the module. 2. Matthias: This seems like it is an ideal candidate for JSONify-ing; would you agree? If so, what would you think is the

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-09 Thread Chris Hillery
Review: Approve Approving the changes as they are. Matthias, let us know if you think it should JSONified immediately or if we can come back to it. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module/+merge/170214 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-07-09 Thread Chris Hillery
One note: we cannot JSONify the geo module [can we?], since it is an EXPath module. There are no common APIs or schemas between geo and geoproj so far as I know, but they might be used by similar people. So, might it be weird if one is XML and one is JSON? Not really sure how to make that call.

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module

2013-06-18 Thread Juan Zacarias
Juan Zacarias has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/update3.0_geoproj-module into lp:zorba/geoproj-module. Commit message: Changes for Update 3.0 Requested reviews: Chris Hillery (ceejatec) Related bugs: Bug #1188046 in Zorba: Update non-core module geoproj