Re: [Zutils-bug] Version 1.0-rc3 of zutils released

2012-10-31 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Dagobert Michelsen wrote: The code in zcat str.insert( 0U, 1, '1' ); matches the first declaration (0U is a position in str), for 32 bit this is correct, however on 64 bit the type is 0UL which causes the ambiguity. When I change the type to 0UL it works for 64 bit, but not 32 bit. What is

Re: [Zutils-bug] Version 1.0-rc3 of zutils released

2012-10-29 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Antonio, Am 29.10.2012 um 12:07 schrieb Antonio Diaz Diaz ant_d...@teleline.es: Version 1.0-rc3 of zutils is ready for testing here http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/zutils/zutils-1.0-rc3.tar.gz http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/zutils/zutils-1.0-rc3.tar.lz The md5sums

Re: [Zutils-bug] Version 1.0-rc3 of zutils released

2012-10-29 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Hello Dagobert. Thanks for the feedback. Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I just did a test on Solaris 9 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 and got the following issues: 1. requires inttypes.h instead of stdint.h and requires extra include signal.h There are due the old OS and probably not worth fixing: I

Re: [Zutils-bug] Version 1.0-rc3 of zutils released

2012-10-29 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Antonio, Am 29.10.2012 um 17:28 schrieb Antonio Diaz Diaz ant_d...@teleline.es: 2. Wrong type on str.insert: should be (char *) NULL instead of 0L This leads to ambiguous casts either on 32 bit or with 0UL on 64 bit. This can easily be corrected with