On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Christopher Barker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> I do not recommend buying off-contract. It is usually a wash if you end
>> up breaking the contract in terms of penalties versus buying
>> off-contract and if you end up not breaking the contract you get a great
>> deal.
>
> yup -- look at the specific numbers, but last I checked, EVERY carrier had
> the same set-up -- sign a contract and we subsidize the hardware a lot, or
> buy the hardware for an inflated price, and we'll charge EXACTLY the same
> monthly rate -- no discount at all for providing your own hardware.

1) That's not the case. T-Mobile and Sprint both have (very slightly)
discounted plans, although you have to dig for them. Having said that,
the total savings last time I checked was only about $10 a month.

2) Even on carriers where it is the case (I'm looking at you, VZW and
AT&T) usually the ETF is just a smidge over the difference anyway. Why
bother getting a Droid X at $200 with a $350 ETF when you could buy a
Droid X for $450 and get the same contract price? If you care enough
about a phone to get a top-tier device, odds are good you aren't going
to want that device in 2 years.

> I really resent that scheme, and am hoping that some day they will simply
> offer you the option of buying or renting the hardware, (with a reasonable
> discount in exchange for a commitment to a contract, if you want).

I've heard of contract pools, where everybody buys in at a membership
tier and after some (short) amount of time the phone rotates down the
ladder. I've never heard how well it works out though....

> But if you're going to buy the hardware outright, there are other options,
> like the Nokia n900, for instance: it's not Android, and may not be
> "established enough", but it is real genuine, familiar, full featured Linux,
> including Python scripting. (the n900 is a bit old now, if you're thinking
> about it, you might want to wait for the upcoming n9)

Nice hardware on those things, there's one in the lab.

Geremy Condra

Reply via email to