8.3. On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Andrew McHarg <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have not used both side by side so I can't properly compare but I > have not had any problems at least in terms of bugs using postgresql > 8.3 and 9.0.2. What version of postgresql are you using? > > Andrew > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:39 PM, John DeRosa <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's the first time I've heard psycopg2 described that way. We use it > at work (a large Django application), and I've used it for a couple (3? 5?) > years. It's rock solid. > > > > On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:59, Mark McWiggins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've just been working on a project to connect to a Postgresql database > with Python, and I found: > >> > >> * SQLObject too slow > >> * SQLAlchemy too slow > >> * psycopg2 very buggy > >> * psycopg somewhat buggy > >> > >> Is the MySQL interface any better? > >> > >> -- > >> Mark McWiggins > >> 425-369-8286 (cell) > > > > -- Mark McWiggins 425-369-8286 (cell)
