>>>>> "d" == doc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: d> Thank You! I shoulda tried that. I didn't, and stand corrected on the d> documentation issue. You're welcome. But this brings an idea to mind: wouldn't it be nice if you could do "rpm -q --releasenotes sendmail"? It doesn't have to be much, but when important functionality of a package changes fundamentally, there should be a way to ask the package what happened. Even incorporating the text from RELEASE-NOTES into the changelog would be enough. - J< _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 doc
- RE: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vik Heyndrickx
- RE: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vik Heyndrickx
- RE: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 doc
- RE: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 John Moretti
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 doc
- RE: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vik Heyndrickx
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Tom Diehl
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vladimir G Ivanovic
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Florian La Roche
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Thomas Dodd
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vladimir G Ivanovic
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 doc
- Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1 Vladimir G Ivanovic