On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:59:09AM +0700, loeung vidol wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look for those client programs.
> Well, I still would like to know how we can convert an xinetd-dependent
> service to a standalone one.

Generally, the server needs to be written to support standalone
operation in addition to being invoked by xinetd or inetd.  For
example, both Samba and the Apache web server support both.

I don't believe you can do this with the standard telnetd included in
the distribution -- a peek at the man page (man in.telnetd) shows that
the standalone mode is only meant for use when debugging the telnet
server.

Apache and Samba are run in a standalone mode in order to avoid the
potentially large startup overhead incurred when inetd starts up a new
copy of the server, which is much higher than what you'd get when a
standalone listener forks off a copy of itself to handle an incoming
connection.

For the telnet server, I wouldn't worry about it, since most of the work
done when someone logs in using telnet is actually being done by login,
and you can't get around that by switching to a standalone server.

Cheers,

Nalin



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to