On 2001-08-07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Understood, but he said he's using startx 2&>1 | tee xwinlog and we are
>saying to use startx 2>&1 | tee winlog (or shorter way, startx >& |tee
>xwinlog) which would account for him not getting anything in his
>xwinlog, no?
Yes. :) As has been pointed out before, 2&>1 is wrong and does not
direct stderr to stdout, so stderr is not captured. But 2>&1 does.
So does >&.
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
