On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Taylor, ForrestX wrote:

> Did you try the -l or -L options to fsck.ext3?  You need to add the
> badblocks to the filesystem so that it won't use them again.  I have to do
> this every once in a while on my old 2 GB disk running 7.0 ;o)
I am having a similar problem with my 2.5Gig disk running RH7.1, I have
never used fsck before in fact this is the first I have heard of it.  What
is the command I need to run to mark off these bad sectors?

Andre

>
> It is a bad sign on such a new disk, though.  You may want to check with the
> manufacturer about getting a new disk.
>
> Forrest
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:49 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: HARD-DISK bad blocks
> >
> >
> > Hello,after a power-failure I noticed these disk errors
> > that I guess are uncorrectable but I hope to be wrong:
> >
> > Jan  5 21:48:44 linux kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda),
> > sector 106864
> > Jan  5 21:48:46 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > SeekComplete Error }
> > Jan  5 21:48:46 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
> > UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=106932, sector=106864
> > Jan  5 21:48:46 linux kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda),
> > sector 106864
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > SeekComplete Error }
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
> > UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=106932, sector=106864
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda),
> > sector 106864
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > SeekComplete Error }
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
> > UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=106932, sector=106864
> > Jan  5 22:07:59 linux kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda),
> > sector 106864
> >
> > I guess that it is a phisical damage to the hard-disk's sector number
> > 106864
> >
> > I'm using Red Hat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.7-10) with ext3 filesystem
> > (journalled-ordered).
> > I ran "fsck.ext3 -c" and a lot of bad sectors were discovered,
> > finally I ran "fsck.ext3 -p -v -c" and fsck reported 220 bad blocks
> > found
> > on root partition /dev/hda.Despite of that,I nomore see same errors as
> > above,
> > they are only:
> >
> > [root@linux etc]# tail -f /var/log/messages
> > Jan  7 18:08:13 linux gconfd (marco-1275): 21 items remain in
> > the cache
> > after cleaning already-synced items older than 300 seconds
> > Jan  7 18:15:34 linux kernel: hda: timeout waiting for DMA
> > Jan  7 18:15:34 linux kernel: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported
> > ide_dma_timeout func only: 14
> > Jan  7 18:15:34 linux kernel: hda: status error: status=0x58 {
> > DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> > Jan  7 18:15:34 linux kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
> > gen  7 19:05:46 linux su(pam_unix)[1988]: session opened for user root
> > by marco(uid=500)
> > Jan  7 19:07:24 linux kernel: hda: timeout waiting for DMA
> > Jan  7 19:07:24 linux kernel: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported
> > ide_dma_timeout func only: 14
> > Jan  7 19:07:24 linux kernel: hda: status error: status=0x58 {
> > DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> > Jan  7 19:07:24 linux kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
> >
> > {HDA NOTES:}
> > {hda: Maxtor 2B020H1, ATA DISK drive}
> > {hda: 40020624 sectors (20491 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=2491/255/63,
> > (U)DMA}
> >
> > The disk access speed was reduced before running fsck,now it seems
> > normal
> > as before power-failure.
> > Is now a DMA setting problem or is still a DISK problem?
> >
> > What you think? Is there any repairing solution?
> >
> > --
> > 73's! Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      | http://www.qsl.net/ik5bcu
> > i.p.:44.134.210.32 44.134.210.33 |
> > AMPRNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > AX25:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | GSM:+393297378262
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seawolf-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seawolf-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
>

-- 
Regards,
André C.
Technical Support
Ô¿Ô¬



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to