Dear Andrew,

Andrew Smith wrote:
> 
> The other big possibility for the swapping is cache/buffers used by
> the system. Try
> 
> cat /proc/meminfo
> 
> to see if linux itself is using up a lot/most of your memory.
> What happens is that linux will use up as much 'spare' memory as
> is available for cache/buffering.
> It will free up some when processes need it.
That's what I read about somewhere and I wasn't sure how to detect if
our effect is related to that. I just tried the cat /proc/meminfo on
my own maschine, and the results look like this:

[urmel@tiger urmel]$ cat /proc/meminfo
        total:    used:    free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
Mem:  2108166144 1389498368 718667776  4251648 36659200 838594560
Swap: 1850646528 134479872 1716166656
MemTotal:      2058756 kB
MemFree:        701824 kB
MemShared:        4152 kB
Buffers:         35800 kB
Cached:         687612 kB
SwapCached:     131328 kB
Active:         408756 kB
Inact_dirty:    196000 kB
Inact_clean:    254136 kB
Inact_target:   524148 kB
HighTotal:     1179100 kB
HighFree:       214860 kB
LowTotal:       879656 kB
LowFree:        486964 kB
SwapTotal:     1807272 kB
SwapFree:      1675944 kB

I have 2GB RAM, and MemFree reports that there are 700KB left to
allocate.
Now when I have a look at the top (sorted by memory):

  7:00am  up 23 days, 15:52, 12 users,  load average: 0.20, 0.11, 0.09
137 processes: 132 sleeping, 5 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states:  9.1% user, 15.3% system,  0.0% nice, 75.0% idle
CPU1 states: 15.1% user,  9.2% system,  0.0% nice, 75.1% idle
Mem:  2058756K av, 1356652K used,  702104K free,    4152K shrd,   35824K
buff
Swap: 1807272K av,  130980K used, 1676292K free                  688264K
cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
17764 urmel      9   0  214M 167M  9252 S     0.0  8.3  16:23
netscape-commun
16492 root       9   0  288M  25M  4744 R     0.3  1.2 370:30 X
17113 glanger    9   0  7760 6504  2264 S     0.0  0.3   0:01 xterm
16965 urmel      9   0  6104 5688  4184 S     0.0  0.2   2:43 panel
 1265 glanger    9   0  4952 4904  2708 S     0.0  0.2   0:01 emacs
 1334 xfs        9   0  6524 4696  1976 S     0.0  0.2   0:06 xfs
16894 urmel      9   0  4584 4480  2376 S     0.1  0.2  19:15 sawfish
17062 urmel      9   0  4848 4344  3448 S     0.0  0.2   3:40
tasklist_applet
  916 root       9   0  7444 4284   688 S     0.0  0.2   1:48 ypserv
 9830 urmel      9   0  4240 4240  3320 S     0.0  0.2   0:00
gnome-terminal
 9672 urmel      9   0  4096 4096  3248 S     0.0  0.1   0:00
gnome-terminal
17017 urmel      9   0  4172 3948  3408 S     0.0  0.1   3:34
deskguide_apple
13912 urmel     10   0  4040 3856  3244 S     2.1  0.1 221:12 gtcd
20788 urmel      9   0  4104 3832  3248 S     0.0  0.1   0:02
gnome-terminal
 1159 glanger    9   0  4264 3812  1748 S     0.0  0.1   2:19 xterm
16967 urmel      9   0  4396 3688  3136 S     0.0  0.1   0:13 gmc

I just can't see why those 1.3GB RAM should be un-usable. (and it seems
I'm
facing the same effect not only on the one machine I mentioned :-) ).

Kind regards,
Urte
--



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to