Hi, The final scenario is the one you described. I need to keep servers #4 and #5 with direct connection to the internet (cannot depend on server #1), so I have to configure the router to redirect only the traffic related to the servers #2 and #3 to server server #1. Ok.
I guess at the server #1 side IPChains will take care of the rest. Is there a problem to have server #2 (200.199.99.xx) dgw pointing to a local IP address (10.1.1.8) ? I tried to configure two adapters within the same IP block (200.199.99.xx) but when I activate the second adapter the default gateway is lost and I am unable to reassign it. Thanks for you help. Luciano Eicke Web Garage S/C Ltda e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fones: 55-41-9106-6566 55-41-3023-4881 -----Original Message----- From: Scott Krabler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sábado, 28 de Setembro de 2002 19:36 Subject: RE: routing how to >It sounds like you want couple of machines to be masked behind another one. >Here's the proper config (below). Default gateway for #4 & #5 is #1 (second >interface). dgw for #1-3 is the router's inside interface. > >In order to route traffic, you must have separate LAN segments. > >Router > | > Hub > | >+----+---+ >| | | >#1 #2 #3 >| >Hub > | >+---+ >| | >#4 #5 > >Hope this helps. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luciano Eicke >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 3:27 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: routing how to > > >Hi, > >I've been trying to "play" with route and ipchains for a while with no >success. I hope somebody can help me. > >The scenario: > >I have an internet link with valid IP addresses. > >My router IP address is 200.199.99.193 > >I have a Linux-RedHat 7.2 server (#1) at 200.199.99.195 (ETH0), default >gateway pointing to the router (200.199.99.193). >I have a second Linux server (#2) at 200.199.99.220 (ETH0) >I have a third Linux server (#3) at 200.199.99.221 (ETH0) > >I have two NT servers (#4 and #5) at 200.199.99.194 and 200.199.99.196 >respectively, default gateway pointing to the router (200.199.99.193). > >Servers #1, #4, #5 and the router are connected to the same hub. >Servers #2 and #3 are connected to another hub, which in turn is "uplinked" >to the first hub. > >I want #1 to control how much bandwidth is allocated to servers #2 and #3 (I >intend to use HTB), so i need to enable servers #2 and #3 to get to the >router (and from there to the internet and vice-versa) through server #1. >I mean, all incoming and outgoing traffic related to servers #2 should flow >like: >server #2 => server #1 => router => internet >internet => router => server #1 => server #2 > >The same to server #3. > >Servers #4 and #5 must not depend on server #1, so these servers'direct >connection to the router must remain. > >What I tried: > >I installed a second ethernet adapter at server #1 (ETH1), assigned a local >IP address to it (10.1.1.8), connected a UTP to the hub and to the ETH1 >interface and set IPChains Input rules as: >>From 200.199.99.220, iface ETH1 (i did the same to server #3) >To 0.0.0.0 >Redirect to host 200.199.99.193 > >What I wanted to happen is all incoming traffic from server #2 >(200.199.99.220) arriving at the ETH1 interface to be forwarded to the >router (200.199.99.193). >Since I have a default gateway to 200.199.99.193, I assumed the static route >table would take care of it. > >Is this approach correct or I'm going the wrong way ? > >Does the standard installation of IPChains (the one that ships with Red Hat >7.2) allows "forwarding" ? > >I went through the how-to's at linuxdoc and other sources but I was unable >to put the pieces together. > >Any help would be most appreciated. > >Best regards, > > Luciano Eicke > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Seawolf-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list > > > >_______________________________________________ >Seawolf-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list