> it's vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 and kernel.h-2.4.7) is your kernelversion > Please help me on this! My linux box is redhat 7.x, not sure is distribution version
kernel 2.4.7 don't like gcc 3 you need the gcc update rpm's from redhat update ftp. not higher ( gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-85)) when you need gcc 3 for any ohter reason please compile beside and set $PATH so they are separated. do not give path to gcc 3 to kernel up to 2.4.19 2.4.20 I did not try. but this is my experience. maybe someone else have other experiences. regards~andreas > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hong Li > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Urgent,Upgrade Glibc 2.3 Failed,can't boot > > > Guys, > > Please help me on this! My linux box is redhat 7.x, not sure (but in /boot > it's vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 and kernel.h-2.4.7). While I try to install > libxml2.4 > rpm, it ask for glibc 6 so I guess mine is libc 5. then i start a pain > process. so many depencies. Finally, I start with install new gcc > 3.2.2(install successfully) and glibc 2.3.1, and linuxthread > > Follow steps in INSTALL file from glibc2.3.1, but when make install, I > can't remember if I type "env LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C" with "make install", > anyway, after that, I type any command, said " > > /bin/sh: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: version 'GLBIC_2.3' not found (required by > /lib/libdl.s0.2) > /bin/sh: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: version 'GLBIC_PRIVATE' not found > (required by > /lib/libdl.s0.2) > /bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.1.1' not found (required by > /lib/i686/libc.s0.6) > /bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.2.3' not found (required by > /lib/i686/libc.s0.6) > /bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.2' not found (required by > /lib/i686/libc.s0.6) > > > > and when I reboot, said "kernel panic...", now I boot with RH 8.0 CD with > "linux rescue", so every file is there under /mnt/sysimage. What should I > do???? searched alot but no solution, seems from reading this > might be some > symbol link error? though installed those glibc2.3 but hadn't really link > correctly by ld? What should I do ????Many many thanks, > > > Vincent > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seawolf-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list > _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list