On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Simon Hirscher <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:22 PM, "Jörg F. Wittenberger"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Am 12.11.2013 11:04, schrieb carlo von lynX:
> >> I don't believe sharing your party pictures with
> >> your employer is the #1 usage problem we have to deal with - users are
> >> slowly learning to be aware of that and it is actually a tech problem of
> >> Facebook that it cannot separate the employers from the party people.
> >> With the PSYC channel logic separation in secushare is easy.
> >
> >
> > Hm, wasn't this the point where I was not sure in the first place?  I
> don't
> > see that a floating point number is enough to assure a strict enough
> > permission handling.  I do require more (see above).  And I'd recommend
> > everybody to go back to the "human rights" test to verify that their
> > permission management system will not betray them.
> >
>
> Let me chime in here because I think the two of you are talking about
> two different things.
>
> The floating point number is just a measure of some kind of general
> trust that you have in a person, reflecting whether you think that
> person (node) is working for the NSA or whether you trust this person
> with e.g. storing your backups or forwarding your messages… which that
> person still won't be able to read if he's not the recipient since
> they are encrypted. Yet, he might be able to tell who is sending
> messages to whom.
>
> The permissions Carlo is talking about above (and you as well) are way
> up the software architecture. GNUnet needs the floating point to do
> the basic routing but couldn't care less about whether you share your
> party pics with your friends or your employer. The latter part is
> managed on the level of PSYC channels.
>

Ah, thank you so much for this clarification!! I was absolutely getting the
floating point trust model confused with how to customize the
privacy/recipients of a message.

In that case I am still wondering whether it is possible to do
facebook/g+/etc -style "posts" that are visible to the "public", "friends",
or some custom group of contacts.

Thanks!

-- 
Board of Directors, Free Culture Foundation: www.freeculture.org
Campaigns Organizer, Free Software Foundation: www.fsf.org

Blog: http://kxra.info  -  StatusNet Microblog: http://identi.ca/kxra
Email: [email protected]  -  SMS: +1.617.340.3661
Jabber/XMPP: [email protected]  -  IRC: kxra @freenode @oftc @indymedia
-- [email protected]
   https://lists.tgbit.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/secu-share

Reply via email to