El 30/10/15 a las 06:47, carlo von lynX escribió:
While prism-break is great, but doesn't really explain what the individual projects deliver compared to each other. While the EFF messaging scorecard lacks metadata protection. While the LEAP secure email report is heavily biased by priotization of legacy compatibility, here is a comparison of free software tools which goes technologically in-deep and focuses on trying to protect our constitutional obligations and liberties for real, without promoting broken technologies just because they are popular. It has six sections on the following topics:Use Case: Social Networking Use Case: File Exchange Use Case: Instant Messaging Use Case: Asynchronous Messaging (E-Mail) Use Case: Telephony and Video Conferencing Use Case: Chatroom Idling http://secushare.org/comparison is where you find it. Feedback is welcome.
Thank you very much for the update. I am writting this email offline. As soon as I connect, I well check the updates.
Feedback: Did you considered that privacy and anonymity are probably not attainable when using non-free (as of freedom) technology because of the impossibility to audit the code for any kind of espionage? I would consider as non-free any set of hardware and software used that contains any non-free element (regarless of the percentage of free software the set contains).
Hope my comments help! :-) -- [email protected] https://lists.secushare.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/secu-share
