* Moritz Muehlenhoff: > The fix is to remove the package permanantly from the archive, as > it's broken anyway. This is a "fix", as etch will not be affected, > but not a complete fix for those who still have bidwatcher > installed. So this marks a package as addressed, only not with a > patch, but with a big hammer.
But you can infer this information from the Sources files (and use the removed-packages file for double-checking). I don't think it's a good idea to duplicate this data. > Plus, <removed> allows tsck to generate warnings for those, who > still have the package installed (the respective dselect section is > rather unknown to most users). Marking the package as unfixed does the same thing, doesn't it? _______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
