On Monday 19 December 2005 18:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Woody is fully supported to the same extent that Sarge is supported
> by the tracker. It just has more false positives. See the svn
> commit logs for more information.

Woody may also have false negatives, i.e. missing entries for some old 
CVEs that affect woody. Sarge should not have any false negatives.

_______________________________________________
Secure-testing-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team

Reply via email to