On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:08:42 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please be a bit more specific on why "it's fine"?
Because the upstream author (who also found the vulnerability) of the affected package said that version 0.5.5 (available at stable) isn't vulnerable? Best regards, Nelson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
