On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:35:17 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Michael S. Gilbert <[email protected]> [2009-08-10 21:14]: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:58:17 +0000, Nico Golde wrote: > [...] > > > CVE-2009-2414 [libxml2 stack recursion] > > > RESERVED > > > - libxml2 <unfixed> (medium; bug #540865) > > > - [etch] - libxml <unfixed> > > > + [lenny] - libxml <removed> > > > > i still don't think this is what you're trying to get at. you want to > > mark it is removed from unstable, which will automatically also mark > > it removed from lenny. > > No, why should it remove it as removed from lenny as well in > this case?
the tracker is smart. if you mark a package as <removed> in unstable, and it is indeed removed in lenny also, than it will automatically track as removed. > So my current intention is to mark lenny as not containing > libxml and since thsi will be tracked upwards unless marked > as unfixed in unstable this should mark unstable as not > containing libxml as well but etch as unfixed. i commited a change that does what i think you intended to do, please check the CVE pages on the tracker for those issues to see if its what you expect. mike _______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
