Hi, * Steffen Joeris <[email protected]> [2009-10-30 10:22]: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:15:41 am Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:58:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > Or let's simply get rid of them at all. > > > > > > Keeping it would allow us (and others) to see what and how should issues > > > be prioritised. > > > > It's done by current practice; if it's important people work on it, if not > > it's postponed. I don't see it providing any use at all. > I am with Moritz here, if an issue is in serious need of fixing, it usually > gets an RT ticket in one of the security queues (and quite often the first > person that spots it and has the needed spare time fixes it).
About the RT ticket I have to disagree, this is still not wideley used, even I don't use it all the time (yeah shame on me :) And it still helps people who have no yet dived into the specific issue to get an idea of what to look at in case they want to do something. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [email protected] - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpjQkXoRELiq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
