On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:54:53 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote: > Even playing the numbers game with a bit more thoughtful analysis with > the LWN data, lenny looks a lot better. It can be seen that lenny > (2.6.26) was vulnerable to 69% (36 out of 52) of the vulnerabilities > listed there, and squeeze (2.6.32) was vulnerable to 98% (51 out of > 52). In my opinion that's a rather substantial difference, and thus a > problem worth pondering.
Minor correction: lenny was vulnerable to 67% (35 out of 51) and squeeze was vulnerable to 98% (50 out of 51). I had missed the issue that was fixed in 2.6.20 and didn't affect either releases. Best wishes, Mike _______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
