Hi I think that the situation is that the latest return code displayed was the one returned by the latest command executed, in this case the ls -l command.
So I cannot see a problem in this particular case. HTH Marco Correnti ESACERT Marcelo Ravilet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/05/2006 19:24:54: > > Hi dony, > > I see an error when the get command try get the file b.txt, because > this file not exist!, what's the idea with this script? > > > Regards, > Marcelo Ravilet > > > El mié, 03-05-2006 a las 16:42 +0200, Dony Pierre escribió: > > Hi all, > > > > I use SSH client and server on a Solaris 9 server, version is : > > > > Client : > > ******** > > bash-2.05# pkginfo -l SUNWsshu > > PKGINST: SUNWsshu > > NAME: SSH Client and utilities, (Usr) > > CATEGORY: system > > ARCH: sparc > > VERSION: 11.9.0,REV=2002.04.06.15.27 > > BASEDIR: / > > VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > DESC: Secure Shell protocol Client and associated Utilities > > PSTAMP: leo20060203150929 > > INSTDATE: Mar 28 2006 15:17 > > HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider > > STATUS: completely installed > > FILES: 11 installed pathnames > > 4 shared pathnames > > 4 directories > > 7 executables > > 4907 blocks used (approx) > > > > Server : > > ******** > > bash-2.05# pkginfo -l SUNWsshdu > > PKGINST: SUNWsshdu > > NAME: SSH Server, (Usr) > > CATEGORY: system > > ARCH: sparc > > VERSION: 11.9.0,REV=2002.04.06.15.27 > > BASEDIR: / > > VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > DESC: Secure Shell protocol Server > > PSTAMP: leo20060206145323 > > INSTDATE: Mar 28 2006 15:16 > > HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider > > STATUS: completely installed > > FILES: 5 installed pathnames > > 3 shared pathnames > > 3 directories > > 2 executables > > 2147 blocks used (approx) > > > > > > > > We have a SSH return code problem when we use SSH in batch in Solaris. > > We haven't this problem on RedHat. > > > > bash-2.05$ cat a.sftp > > ls -l > > pwd > > get b.txt > > ls -l > > bash-2.05$ sftp -b a.sftp scnsys11 > > Connecting to scnsys11... > > Password: > > sftp> ls -l > > drwxr-xr-x 0 9108 10 512 Apr 21 11:15 . > > drwxr-xr-x 0 0 1 512 Apr 3 14:23 .. > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 2387 Apr 21 11:18 .bash_history > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 240 Mar 28 16:19 .sh_history > > drwx------ 0 9108 10 512 Mar 22 17:11 .ssh > > drwx------ 0 9108 10 512 Mar 22 16:00 .ssh2 > > -rwxrwxrwx 0 9108 10 26 Mar 29 15:22 a.sftp > > -rwxrwxrwx 0 9108 10 0 Mar 28 15:28 a.txt > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 1021424 Mar 22 17:07 core > > sftp> pwd > > Remote working directory: /export/home/huysego > > sftp> get b.txt > > Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory File > > "/export/home/huysego/b.txt" not found. > > sftp> ls -l > > drwxr-xr-x 0 9108 10 512 Apr 21 11:15 . > > drwxr-xr-x 0 0 1 512 Apr 3 14:23 .. > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 2387 Apr 21 11:18 .bash_history > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 240 Mar 28 16:19 .sh_history > > drwx------ 0 9108 10 512 Mar 22 17:11 .ssh > > drwx------ 0 9108 10 512 Mar 22 16:00 .ssh2 > > -rwxrwxrwx 0 9108 10 26 Mar 29 15:22 a.sftp > > -rwxrwxrwx 0 9108 10 0 Mar 28 15:28 a.txt > > -rw------- 0 9108 10 1021424 Mar 22 17:07 core > > sftp> > > bash-2.05$ echo $? > > 0 > > ************************************************************************ > > ********************************************************************** > > As you can see in this example, sftp gives a rc = 0. If you try the same > > on RedHat, you will receive a rc not equal to 0. > > > > Does anybody have a solution to this problem ? Or another SSH client we > > can install in Solaris ?. > > > > Thanks. > > Regards. > > Pierre. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Visit our website! http://www.nbb.be > > > > "DISCLAIMER: The content of this e-mail message should not be > > construed as binding on the part of the National Bank of Belgium > > (NBB) unless otherwise and previously stated. The opinions > > expressed in this message are solely those of the author and do not > > necessarily reflect NBB viewpoints, particularly when the content > > of this message, or part thereof, is private by nature or does not > > fall within the professional scope of its author." > > >
