Daniel Anderson wrote:
> Three things to check:

Thanks for the ideas.

> 1.  Look for collisions on the network ports (we're looking for symptoms
> of a mis-matched duplex on your network)

solbox1# netstat -ni -I skge0
Name  Mtu  Net/Dest      Address        Ipkts  Ierrs Opkts  Oerrs Collis Queue
skge0 1500 10.0.0.0      10.0.0.1       1640325 0     3560947 0     0      0

fc6box1# netstat -ni
Kernel Interface table
Iface       MTU Met    RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR    TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR 
Flg
eth0       1500   0  7400218      1      0      0  4314345      0      0      0 
BMRU
lo        16436   0   161876      0      0      0   161876      0      0      0 
LRU

These two are connected by a crossover cable (the singe RX-ERR is old)

> 2.  Run a 'netstat -an | grep SENT' on both ends during the 10 minute
> wait (maybe in minute 1 or 2)

No *SENT* only ESTABLISHED:

ssh -X 10.0.0.30

sol (client):
   Local Address        Remote Address    Swind Send-Q Rwind Recv-Q    State
10.0.0.1.35651       10.0.0.30.22         18480   6995 49640      0 ESTABLISHED
(vanishes immediately at timeout. I didn't (manage to) see any sort of WAIT)

fc6 (server):
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address               Foreign Address             
State
tcp        0      0 10.0.0.30:22                10.0.0.1:35651              
ESTABLISHED
(stays at least 30 min after the timeout)

Note the "6995" (Send-Q) at the client side. I get this repeatedly whith ssh -X 
10.0.0.30,
but the interactive 'ssh -x 10.0.0.30' sessions (like the one i use to do 
netstat on fc6)
have a 0 there. Does that ring any bell?

I have only default tcp-stack settings. Should I play with Solaris ndd | 
/etc/system ?

> 3.  Name resolution (IP to name and name to IP) on both ends, do them
> each a couple times, make sure you are seeing what you expect

No problems; symetric 1:1 name<=>addr, client&server and no timeouts. The 
Solaris box is
the nameserver. Even tried bombarding:
# repeat 20 host 10.0.0.30

The other solaris/FC6 network has a similar config, but not identical, although 
I
configured both and most likely have configuered them with the same error, if I 
could
figure it out -- or someone could figure it out for me :)

This solbox has nge on the Internet-side (waist of GE, but any way) and skge0 
on the
inside (skge0 hasn't been bulletproof, giving sporadic PCI-errors that only 
reboot fixes)
The other (more remote) has nge0 on both sides, and has been stable (with the 
exception of
this problem), and has a cheap soho GE-switch on the inside.
All FC6 boxes have identical HW with 100T e100 eth0.
The Solarisboxes are "headless" 24*7 home-server (NFS/ZFS,SAMBA,FW/GW) while 
FC6 are desktops.
I've moved big files like DVD-images over NFS at the expected speed of ~80Mbps.

-- 
Med vennlig hilsen / Regards
Basefarm AS
Pål Baltzersen

begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:P=C3=A5l Baltzersen
n;quoted-printable:Baltzersen;P=C3=A5l
org:Basefarm AS
adr:;;Sandakerveien 138;Oslo;Oslo;NO-0484;Norway
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior systemkonsulent. Cand. Scient.
tel;work:+47 93081174
tel;fax:+47 40004080
tel;home:+47 93081174
tel;cell:+47 93081174
note;quoted-printable:Alle supporthenvendelser skal rettes til:=0D=0A=
	[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Superbrukere i Oslo kommune)=0D=0A=
	[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alle andre)=0D=0A=
	
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.basefarm.no
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to