surelly, I am missing something. In a widely open network as this, how can it be secure ??
Iain McAleer wrote: > Hey guys, > > To be honest, if your system is secure a firewall is redundant. I am aware > of a company here in Perth that is part of a multi-million dollar > corporation. They have NO firewalls in place and are not implimenting NAT. > Infact they have live IP's for all their workstations. The reason they have > no firewall and can keep running with this is because their system is > secure. The biggest security risk is always going to be exploits and your > own clients idiocy. > saudações, Irado Furioso com Tudo Linux (SuSE) User 179402 se abrirem as portas de *todas* as prisões, os roubos ainda serão em menor volume do que os de nossos políticos. Na verdade, mal perceberíamos a diferença (think about)!.
