Netstumbler would be a good choice.  I think that the perl script is a 
much more inventive solution, but in a pinch, netstumbler is a good idea 
for 'Gee, I wonder if there's a WAP around'.  I have a  relative who war 
drives with his laptop and netstumbler.  It sounds dumb, but is actually 
very interesting-- no one locks down their WAPs--  not even me (but that's 
a different story).  

Regardless, I belive that the perl script is the way to go.  As well, 
locking down MAC addresses is the best, although inefficient way.

adam


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> Check out www.netstumbler.com.  I'm 
> not sure if they are white hats or 
> grey hats, but their site includes 
> links and info on vendors of 
> equipment, as well as summarized info 
> on 802.11b.  The only way I know of, 
> at this moment, to secure WAPs is by 
> isolating and securing the vlans on 
> which the WAPs are located and to 
> require WAP sessions to use IPSec VPN 
> sessions.  Have fun...
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >Wrom: YOQKEDOTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBR
> >To: <security-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 
> 4:57 PM
> >Subject: Detecting WAP's
> >
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> I spent the better part of my 
> morning today tracking down a WAP 
> within
> >> my building.  We basically stumbled 
> onto the signal by blind luck
> >> (testing a WAP enabled laptop) and 
> I proceeded to walk around on a few
> >> floors searching cubicles until I 
> found it sitting inside someone's
> >> cabinet.
> >> 
> >> My current network policy is no 
> wireless devices.
> >> 
> >> My question is how does one 
> proactively monitor for a WAP in a 
> standard
> >> routed/switched environment.  Is 
> there any intelligent way to accomplish
> >> this?  I would be interested in 
> ideas/solutions for LAN's and WAN's.  
> Is
> >> there something I can look for 
> within each packet or perhaps specific
> >> types of traffic (broadcast?) 
> create by the WAP?
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately I am not up on 802.11 
> (yet) and this recent incident has
> >> me concerned given anyone within 
> range had free access to my network.
> >> 
> >> Any comments, links, documents, or 
> criticisms are welcome.  Please
> >> respond to the group.
> >> CM
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to