Larry,
When I began work on the OSSTMM (Open Source Security Testing Methodology
Manual (www.osstmm.org) I used the ISO 17799 in the framework because I
wanted to be sure that for one, we did complete the most thorough security
test possible and for two, because I wanted to make sure we were compliant.
That meant that anyone using the OSSTMM would be able to ensure themselves
of BS7799 / iso17799 compliancy as well.  With the help of some others, we
went through through BS7799 step by step, pulling out each and reference
that we could include in sec testing-- and we noticed that for us, not much
applied.  The OSSTMM is a manual designed for the testing of security from
the outside getting in and the BS 7799 focused on mostly internal
policy/procedure/best practices auditing.  Although the guide gave us much
help and ideas, it was lacking in the area we really needed it for-- it was
lacking in the testing of security controls, measures, and procedures from
the outside to the inside.

I hope that helps.

Sincerely,
-pete.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 17:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BS 7799/ISO 17799




Hello all,

I'm seeking comments from security professionals
and organizations that have either considered,
adopted or gained certification under BS 7799/ISO
17799.

Specifically, I'd like to hear about people's experience
going through the adoption/certification process, why
they chose to use 7799 as a framework or a
standard, and whether it was worth it.

I'd like to hear from people who've looked at 7799 and
decided against using it. Things I'd like to hear are
why it's not worth adopting, problems in its standards
(too broad, too specific, etc.) and so forth.

Additionally, I'd like to hear from those people who've
found alternatives to 7799. What are they and why
are they better than 7799?

Finally, I'd be interested in people's thoughts about
the creation of a "one-size-fits-all" standard for
Information Security. Is such a thing possible? Will
7799 eventually evolve into such a standard? Or will
there be another standard that attempts to
encompass everything about IT security?

I appreciate any assistance the members of this list
can lend.

Thanks,
Larry Walsh
Managing Editor
Information Security Magazine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.infosecuritymag.com

Reply via email to