If you are using windows 2k then Active directory will help.

I would say set up 2 domains, Office1 and Office2

Set up a domain forest which will encompass these 2 domains and hey presto,

Just my EUR0.02

Andrew Jones
Helpdesk Advisor
Meggitt Petroleum Systems
Tel +44  (0)2476 697417 Ext. 40
Fax +44 (0)2476 418210
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: leon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:14 PM
> To:   'Matt Andreko'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: splitting up a network
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Why cant you have 1 domain and create the two offices as "sites".
> 
> I thought that domain can encompass multiple sites and a site can
> encompass multiple domains.  That was my understanding of how win2k
> domains worked.
> 
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Andreko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: splitting up a network
> 
> Hi there.  I'm currently administering a network which is being split
> in
> half.  Half of it is going to be placed on an OC3 where all our
> servers
> are, and the other half is our office, which is on a T1, going
> through a
> separate class C IP range.
>  
> I'm trying to figure out a good way to setup this NT/2000 network
> with
> active directory over the 2 networks.  I'd prefer to have them all in
> 1
> domain, so I don't have to deal with domain trusts and such.  Is
> there a
> good way to do this, or do I need to setup 2 separate domains, one
> for
> each location, and do trust relationships between the 2?  Netbios can
> be
> used through these 2 separate ip ranges, and is preferred (although
> it
> will be secured and audited regularly).
>  
> Also, is there a good way to firewall the office machines, but still
> have them be part of the domain, but not publicly available (only to
> a
> certain group on the domain?).  I would prefer to put all the
> machines
> behind a linksys or maybe even a cisco router, to keep them
> protected.
> The machines on the OC3 don't need firewall protection really.
>  
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - --
> Matt Andreko
> On-Ramp Indiana
> (317)774-2100
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> 
> iQA/AwUBPExaW9qAgf0xoaEuEQJfEwCgxn1lGbzJYlTTuuqi2gS8yb3aFb4AoLRW
> tsaYXp0XZNHOpxDUKrdAkpMD
> =Hh4K
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to