Well, your topology is haywire ... !!!
Better if you can attach as a txt file.
Anyway, what you say can be run. It should work. But if there is significant
data
Alternatively, the better way to minimise any problems in to not to do any
NAT. And run the second firewall as 'related' network.
i.e. create subnets between the second segment and drop in a firewall
between them.
Naren
Pacific Technology, Singapore
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tejinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 5:37 AM
Subject: NAT question
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if this is possible.
>
>
> Here is my topology
>
>
----------------------
> nated
> nated public IP -- --
> ------------------ private ip ---------------------- private
> IP ------------------- | Internet |
> |Hosts |----------------|inner Firewall |-----------------|outer
> router |-------------- | |
> ------------------ | ---------------------
> ------------------- -- --
> |
> -------------------
> ------------------ |
> |web services|-------
> ------------------
>
>
> My first question is, is this possible, I have only one public address,
and
> I am running a linux firewall (via IPTABLES), and using nat to hide my
> internal network, and then I have another firewall inside my network, and
I
> want to run nat on that again, but this time both of the addresses will be
> private. And then run my web server and ftp server inside that
> network. So my question is can I run nat on the IP which is already being
> nated by outside firewall.
>
> Thanks for help in advance
>
> Tsingh
_____________________________________________________________________
This OUTBOUND message has been checked for all known viruses by the
Swiftech Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.swiftech.net.sg/html/antivirusdetails.html or write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
