Quoting John Ridge Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> compatibility.  Also while being in development for about 3 years, none of
> the authors feel its necessary for a consistent, official, average user
> friendly GUI.  There are several front ends available, but their reliability
> in various operating environments differ, as do the openness of their source
> code.

Frontends introduce yet another layer of insecurity. Introducing
insecurity defeats the purpose of a program such as GPG. Writing
closed code does that, too, so both the existing closed code frontends
as well as the stuff available for the rightfully so deceased
PGP-perversion, are to be considered an abomination, not an
improvement.

I cannot count how many frontends I have found for both Windows and
Mac OS, that cached __passphrases in cleartext__ or forgot to safely
wipe all traces of its execution opon exit from memory and swap,
something that I would consider really bad bahavior.

Frontends for a program that can be controlled without any problems
with the use of no more than ten arguments, are anything but a
necessity.

Reply via email to