-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would use LC4 the what's new section claims the algorithms are improved and the cracking time is faster.
Just a thought. Cheers, leon - -----Original Message----- From: Michael Ungar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: L0phtcrack3 Metrics I've been challenged by one of my peers to provide metrics on the amount of time it would take L0phtcrack3 to crack an eight character password that was alphanumeric vs a similar password that was alphamumeric but had a requirement for upper and lower case level. So for example, would it take L0phtcrack3 signiifcantly longer to crack a password of "1367AseR" vs "1367aser". Thanks.....Mike Ungar __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPQtXv87zNvD2yOEeEQJ8+wCeOzP05GhdVC7sSqAdnFpkoqeMbXoAoL6q iuzsz0Tlmo5pp+jVDXzOwgHl =e+xv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
