And less invasive. Keep in mind that with retina scanner you can scan the veins in the back of the eye - which touches medical concerns. Based on your heart-beat you could infer some medical condition and in US touching without consent anything that has to do with medical history is a big No no.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:04:44 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Felix Cuello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Biometric question > > > Well it depends, how desperate somebody wants to get into the computer > room, e.g would they be willing to cut off your hand or pull out your > eyeball. > I would think that finger prints would be the best. It is considerably > cheaper then a retinal scanning equipment. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Felix Cuello) To: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > 11/06/2002 02:27 Subject: Biometric question > PM > > > > > > > > Hello list! > > I will work in a project where phisical security will be based on > biometrics, in fact only will be based on fingerprints biometric. > > How secure are fingerprints?, what biometric are more secure? (voice, > eye, ??? what else). > > I'm not a security expert :-) > > Thanks a lot, > > Felix > [my english is bad... please sorry :-)] > > -- > Felix Cuello > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Qodiga/its > Av.Santa Fe 882 P.13 Of. "E" > C.P. ABP1059C > Tel.: (54) 011 - 4312-1698 > Buenos Aires - Argentina > > > > > >
