> However; don't do anything illegal in that process! Nobody > takes kindly to having hacker tools running on their network.
I've generally been glad to permit read-only tools (scanners, sniffers) on two conditions: that the person running them is part of the admin team already(*), and that they ASK FIRST. Non- admins running them, or without permission, are indistinguishable from the "internal threats" category that tends to dominate security incident statistics.... * - Another person on the admin team who understands the network and its security issues is someone I can start dumping small tasks to when there's too much going on at once, and today's "admin interested in this stuff" is tomorrow's "junior security engineer" and who knows what down the road. Dave Gillett > -----Original Message----- > From: Shaw, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: January 8, 2003 21:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Security+ > > > {long post warning} > > Mr. McCarthy, as well as the other responders, are very much > right on the > money here. If you have little to no experience you have to > *get* that > experience. However; don't do anything illegal in that > process! Nobody > takes kindly to having hacker tools running on their network. > Anything you > experiment with or test should not be connected to the > outside world in any > way - it's just safer to keep from accidentally releasing a > trojan or doing > something that will have your cable or DSL company kill your > account than to > use one of the machines you are working this stuff on have > 'net access. > Keep in mind that you have a fine line to look at; and it's > easy to ruin > your chances at a good legitimate job or a government > clearance by even > 'hinting' at any wrongdoing. I'm not saying you plan on it > but I just felt > I should put my feelings on this here. > > I have a couple years' experience "brushing" upon security > topics as I have > done a lot of installations and troubleshooting in my brief > eight years in > IT. That means *nothing* - the folks that hired me where I > am now could > care less what four-letter designations I already had; they > wanted to know > what I could learn and do and if I'd sit still for 12 hours watching a > monitor. You know about this business - it's not as easy at > it looks on > paper. I just recently landed and entry-level network > security position and > am taking as much advantage as I can of the certified and > highly experienced > security professionals on this team to learn what I can from > them; and to > apply things to my personal lab at home - which was > 'retooled' from a web > applications QA testing environment to a security > environment. I'm working > a while and waiting to see how the security certification > market matures > over the next year or two before even dreaming of taking any > exams; and I'll > probably take them in a low-to-high-level progression with > the Security+ or > SSCP designation first; then make sure I have the real world > time in to > attempt anything else. You can take my story as an example > or leave it; but > the old maxim: "Each one teach one" has proven oh-so-true in > this field. > > I get the impression Security+ is geared towards system or > network admins > that need to add some security experience to their broad base > of skills; > while the SSCP/CISSP tracks are an administrative/management > focus. A lot > of the managers and experienced network engineers here swear > by the GIAC > tracks but immediately warn you they are *tough* - with essays and > practicals and grueling exams. I've read a couple of the > books from SANS > since I started this job and they are very very good but make > you *think*. > Your mileage may vary. Take the time to decide what you > really want and > please do yourself and the rest of us a favor by getting good > at what you > want to do so we all have respected certifications and a > future in this > business. There are bound to be plenty of opportunities in > the near future > for all levels of competence in the security area. > > {The preceding message is my impression and opinion, and mine > alone. I am > not a manager [here though I have managed a help desk in the > past] and make > no policy or other 'quotable' statements direct or implied.] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack McCarthy > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Security+ > > > I'm in a similar situation. I'm not a pro by a long shot, > but here are some > things that have > helped me...at least get a better handle on 'some' of the > concepts. I'm > still a long way off from > being a security professional... > > Build a home network (or some sort of test network) and include the > following: > -A broadband connection. DSL or Cable. If you can afford it, have two > separate connections - two > modems. Keep one network connected as a regular connection > so you can check > email and online > documents (technical docs and PDFs) and the other modem > connected to your > test network. This way > when you are trying to get (in my case) your UNIX-like firewall/router > working and tying up one > network, you still have the other network to access the > Internet and look up > online documentation > and check email. Instead of switching back and forth every > time you need to > check email. > > Have the following equipment: > -UNIX or a UNIX-like box. e.g. OpenBSD. > -Linux box. Your pick. > -NT/2000 boxes. > -Hubs/switches. > > > -Build your own firewall/router. UNIX or Linux. If you can > get your hands on > a Firewall-1, even > better. > -Build your own IDS. Snort is free. > -Learn how to use Nmap. > -http://project.honeynet.org/ and read all submissions of 'Scan of the > Month'. > -You have to learn programming! Being able to read code > (a.k.a. exploits) > is an absolute MUST! > I'm studding C programming now. > > -Read all the security news, articles, mailing lists that you > possibly can. > -Go to securityfocus.com and get on all of their mailing > lists. (Obviously > you've already been > there). > -Read, read, read... > > Anyone feel free to expand on this? Improve or rebut my > ideas/strategies? > > I'd be interested to hear what other people are doing to gain more > knowledge/experience. > > > > -Jack > > > > > > > > --- Mike Heitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm new to Security (just had it heaped on me after my last > performance > > review) and am interested in some Certs. I've heard mention > of the CISSP > > before, and have seen articles on the Security+. I have really no > > programming background and have limited access to funds for > training, > > etc... most of my training is through ordering a book from Amazon or > > something and trying the stuff out. > > > > So my question is, am I going to be way over my head > looking into these > > certs? I have been an admin for Novell for 5 years, and > have spent the > > last 3 years in an NT/2000 environment. I want to learn as much as > > possible, but really don't like using things like > Transcender just to > > pass a test. I want to "KNOW" what I am doing. :) > > > > Any advice???? > > > > mike heitz ** sr it manager ** UPSHOT > > 312-943-0900 x5190 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kriss Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:45 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Security-Basics' > > Subject: RE: Security+ > > > > Hey Simon: I have been doing security work for the last > couple of years > > (Intrusion Detect, Policy compliance etc.) I did some > investigation into > > the various Cert's and basically found that most people are > looking for > > CISSP. I wanted to get one Cert this year and it going to > be CISSP. I > > understand that the other cert's are well respected. The > final decision > > should be based upon how the Cert will help in your career path. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > Regards, > > Christopher (Kriss) Warner > > CYBERDINE > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phone: 905.576.5931 > > Fax: 905.571.6562 > > Cell: 416.402.9838 > > www.cyberdinecorp.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Taplin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 3:29 PM > > To: Security-Basics > > Subject: Security+ > > > > Has anybody done/looked at CompTIA's Security+ cert. > > > > Is it a good cert to get because I eventually want to get > into security > > but > > at the moment I don't have the experience/cash to do the > SANS or CISSP > > courses (plus the fact that SANS is offered in South Africa) > > > > Simon > > > > > > Quote of the day: > > Systems Administration is the kind of job that nobody > notices if you're > > doing it well. People only take notice of their systems > when they're not > > working. > > --- > > > > This email has been scanned by AVG Anti-Virus > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 2002/12/30 > > > > > > > > > > >
