Concur. I distrust them to the extent that I never see them. Hence, the vote for inline.
Jim Chris Berry wrote: > > >From: Frank Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I was wondering what people's feelings are here as to the best way to > >digitally sign a message. > >mutt for example creates the digital signature as an attachment, and then > >attaches it, while some people create the > >signature as part of the text of the message. > > > >Which way is best? or most compatable? > > I personally distrust any attachments I didn't specifically request, so my > vote would be for inline signatures. > > Chris Berry > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Systems Administrator > JM Associates > > "For Sys Admins paranoia isn't a mental health problem, its a marketable job > skill." > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566
