FYI, you can delete the administrator account with a free third party
utility.  I forget its name off the top of my head, but it's discussed in
Hacking Exposed Windows 2000.

Of course, I've never been brave enough to try it in a production
environment.

Roger
****************************************************************************
****
*Roger A. Grimes, Computer Security Consultant
*CPA, MCSE (NT/2000), CNE (3/4), A+
*email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*cell: 757-615-3355
*Author of Malicious Mobile Code:  Virus Protection for Windows by O'Reilly
*http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/malmobcode
****************************************************************************
******

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paris Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "stephen at unix dot za dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "dave"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: About default sharing folders in Windows


> Can't delete Administrator or Guest.  Rename & Disable them, then create
dummy
> accounts with those two default names.  All acl's are checked against the
SID's not
> the actual name and the SID's won't change with a rename.  Therefore if
you can't
> delete it and renaming it won't remove the assignments, you're hosed.
There are
> tools out there that will scan your filesystem for rights, can't remember
any just
> now.  Audit the system and manually remove rights.
>
> stephen at unix dot za dot net ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >
> >how about deleting the admininistrator  account (killing that sid)
> >recreating a new account, redoing the privileges for that account,
> >and adding the new username to the administrator or appropriate group.
> >
> >then 'hack the registry'  :D
> >
> >then you should be left with a box with no default shares,
> >administrator/guest default accounts are non-existant, and the new ones
> >have new SIDs.
> >
> >that a possible solution?
> >
> >oh yeh,   this is my first post  :D
> >
> >
> >stephen
> >
> >
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >tel: (031) 207 4811
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, dave wrote:
> >
> >> It is best to "disable" the built in administrator account.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _____________________
> >> Dave Kleiman
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> www.netmedic.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Gillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 17:38
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: RE: About default sharing folders in Windows
> >>
> >> > I strongly suggest renaming the local Administrator and Guest account
> >> > to something that is not easily guessed at.  In addition, you should
> >> > probably create "dummy" accounts named "Administrator" and "Guest"
> >> > that have no rights/no group memberships and are disabled.  Monitor
> >> > the dummy accounts closely for log in attempts.
> >>
> >>   Note that there's no point to this unless you *also* disable the
ability
> >> to enumerate accounts over a null connection.  The renamed
Administrator
> >> account will be trivial to spot by its ID otherwise.
> >>
> >> David Gillett
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Paris Stone
> CISSP, CCNP, CNE, MCSE
> CIW Master Administrator / Security Analyst, NSA
> http://www.ciscoinstructor.net/
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "The rich man is not the one with the most, but the one who needs the
least"
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to