(or both if you're really paranoid.) << Talking about slow?! ... LOL ...
Double 3DES Tunnels (SSH and VPN) ... Let's see, that is up to 68% reduction in bandwidth, plus the overhead that VNC has. That would be quite interesting? Definitely more secure than usual! Maybe all SMP machines and an OC-3 or LAN, then maybe you will have decent speeds and usability... :-D -----Original Message----- From: Chris Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: sshd for windows >From: "Depp, Dennis M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I really like VNC, but it has little security and no encryption. Which is why you pipe it through SSH or a VPN. (or both if you're really paranoid.) Chris Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator JM Associates " --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
