In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Easiest way to do this is to open a prompt on the box and simply 
type "netstat -a"  if theres someone connected to the box it should point  
you right to their IP address. 

Chris

www.cr-secure.net


>Received: (qmail 22282 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 18:15:44 -0000
>Received: from outgoing3.securityfocus.com (205.206.231.27)
>  by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 18:15:44 -0000
>Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com 
[205.206.231.19])
>       by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP
>       id DF73DA3163; Wed,  6 Aug 2003 12:18:42 -0600 (MDT)
>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: <security-basics.list-id.securityfocus.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Delivered-To: moderator for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: (qmail 12361 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 10:56:22 -0000
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Subject: XP Box appears to be compromised
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>       charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:03:31 -0600
>Message-ID: 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-MS-Has-Attach: 
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
>Thread-Topic: XP Box appears to be compromised
>Thread-Index: AcNcPKmigN12jsnKTyK/Qlaav5Jhdg==
>From: "Gregory M. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I've got an issue with what appears to be remote desktop management of
>an XP box.  It's weird...
>
>There are deliberate mouse movements on this box.  I'm assuming it's an
>internal person doing this as our FW and Fortinet device will block any
>remote seizing of a desktop.  I've disabled all the XP remote services,
>and it continues to happen.  I could bust open packets with sniffer, but
>there is a time constraint as the organization laid virtually all IT
>people off.  Imagine that....
>
>What should I be looking for?  I need to nail whoever is doing this.=20
>
>Thanks for any help.
>
>Greg B.
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to