Hi, On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:49 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 20:56 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > I believe this version is pretty clean. And it should be simple to > > verify that it works correctly now since all unnecessary code is just > > thrown out. Of course I threw all the crypto and security tests at it > > that I could find and all happily passed. I did alter the TestUtil class > > so that it always checks all algorithms and full keys. > > > > It would be nice to push this in OpenJDK proper so there is less > > divergence and so the GPLed version always has full crypto support > > enabled. > > > > If you still want to support a ClosedJDK with restricted crypto support > > then all you have to do it provide your own Cipher and JceSecurity > > class, plus any of the now removed auxiliary classes JarVerfifier and > > JceSecurityManager. Everything else can be the same between the free > > openjdk and proprietary closedjdk. > > > > Please let me know if you would need any help integrating this. > > I did already push it into icedtea6. > > I didn't see any replies to this yet. Please do let me know if I can > help in any way to get this pushed forward faster.
It seems this is working out good for the GNU/Linux distros based on the latest IcedTea6 releases, so getting this upstream would be nice. Anything I can do to help with that? Thanks, Mark
