> You're correct. I should have made it clearer in the initial e-mail, > though I did ask if it was ok to push it to tl which is 7 only. The > patch does apply to both, so I'll ask Joe Darcy about backporting it > once it's in 7.
I would imagine it would be no problem at all. I'll be happy to review it again. > Thanks. These are all the values used by the current version of NSS > (3.12.3 IIRC). We usually don't include draft values, unless they have gained wide usage already. > Thanks. Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/c444651077d2 I'll move to Fix available when I get to our internal network (still working at home). >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nss/webrev.01/jdk.patch >> >> Specifying just the top level of the webrev is preferred. > > Whoops! Sorry, I usually do post the right URL. Must have copied the > wrong one. No problem, partly my fault too. I usually use SFRAMES where the change's full context is available. I didn't think to take off the last component of the URL until I was mostly done. Thanks for fixing that. Brad