Your opinion? I still like to keep my changes. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8006564/webrev.00/
-Max On 01/21/2013 10:25 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: > Oh, did I mention jdk8 and jdk7 are using the same format? > > In fact, I don't think it's "too tied to impl", you can see that my fake > jdk6-style class is quite clean itself so it's just a reimpl of the jdk6 > serialization interface. I was more concerned about using the > -Xbootclasspath option, which many people (including you) had said will > be unusable after module. > > -Max > > On 01/21/2013 10:21 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: >> On 21/01/2013 14:19, Wang Weijun wrote: >>> I've thought about that, but it means there is no way to check >>> forward-compatibility. (Am I using the correct word? Deserialize jdk7 >>> format with jdk6). >>> >>> Max >> Right, but this is a test in the jdk8 forest and so it should only be >> testing jdk8. >> >> -Alan >>
