Re: [8] Review Request: 8019360: Cleanup of the javadoc tag in java.security.*

[Joe Darcy]

Hi Jason,

On 06/27/2013 11:11 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
Joe,
Could I please get a review of this changeset?

These changes convert the remaining <code>...</code> and <tt>...</tt> 
tags to {@code ...} in java.security and its subpackages.

Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8019360/webrev.00/

The {@code} related changes look fine to go back as-as.


I've also changed each package's package.html file to 
package-info.java. If you object to the inclusion of those changes in 
this changeset, I could do that under a separate bug.

The package-related changes need a few small edits. In

    src/share/classes/java/security/acl/package-info.java

These lines should be deleted:

  31  * <!--
  32  * <h2>Package Specification</h2>
  33  *
  34  * ##### FILL IN ANY SPECS NEEDED BY JAVA COMPATIBILITY KIT #####
  35  * <ul>
  36  *   <li><a href="">##### REFER TO ANY FRAMEMAKER SPECIFICATION 
HERE #####</a>
  37  * </ul>
  38  *
  39  * <h2>Related Documentation</h2>
  40  *
  41  * For overviews, tutorials, examples, guides, and tool 
documentation, please see:
  42  * <ul>
  43  *   <li><a href="">##### REFER TO NON-SPEC DOCUMENTATION HERE 
#####</a>
  44  * </ul>
  45  * -->

Also in the package files, please replace

    <SUP>TM</SUP>

with

    &trade;


With those changes, I approve the package changes going back,


No undesirable changes were detected by specdiff.



Good to know :-)

Thanks,

-Joe