On 4/10/2014 10:51 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: > So you want to see which line throws SocketTimeoutException? > the line calling accept() and read().
> What does that thread.join(120000) do? Is it possible that after it > finishes no exception was thrown yet and your test shown as succeeded? > IO exception should be thrown when the client cannot read and write. Thanks, Xuelei > --Max > > On 4/10/2014 20:45, Xuelei Fan wrote: >> On 4/10/2014 8:42 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: >>> The code change looks harmless, but I am not sure how it could provide >>> more information next time. >>> >> Next time, with accept timeout and read timeout, we would know on which >> point the threads is more easier to get timeout. >> >> Xuelei >> >>> --Max >>> >>> >>> On 4/10/2014 20:17, Xuelei Fan wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Please review this test case update: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8037557/webrev.00/ >>>> >>>> This is a test timeout issue. Cause is still unknown. I guess that >>>> one >>>> or more of the server threads had not yet been scheduled to run by the >>>> system within the timeout of the testing. I added more timeout in the >>>> code. Hope next time timeout failure, we can get more information. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Xuelei >>>> >>
